Mice wrote:
whorelogram wrote:
I was talking to someone when we first agreed on what the set was gonna be used for and we were back and forth, and I'm gonna be honest, we didn't want it to be completely unlimited, so I thought 175 was a good number, though it turns out that Eli set the other codes for 450, so it looks really bad compared. It wasn't meant to turn out like this, so that's why I say it's my fault.
Mice wrote:
why 175 though?whorelogram wrote:
how is this your fault though??
When we send in codes, we're responsible for mentioning the claims of a code and I happened to tell Sleepy to code it for 175, so it technically is my fault. how is this your fault though??



0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.


22