You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
LexiLuvsKirby
Please join GoofyGoobers!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
15 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Game < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
END IT NOW
Account deleted




wrote:
MsNoName wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Rainacorn5459 wrote:

I mean I gotta check the website Idk who they are
but you said they told you to. it's oddly specific not just "i'm gonna keep checking to see if they say who they are"
Maybe english isn't her first language and she didn't know how to properly express what she meant.
don't overanalyze
I considered that but, as an English language native & student, it's still specific to put that at the front of your sentence "they said". It's something hard to get mixed up really but idk. 
Date: 13-11-2016 03:30
Kaitlin
Youtube Star



Kaitlin wrote:
Kink wrote:
ok someone fill me in on whats happened and what has been said i cant be arsed to read through 19 pages
"ET" came out with a thread saying everything was resolved
plot twist it was the hacker and they released new codes and w/e
then the website was updated with a thing saying like "that code wasn't supposed to come out my accomplice will be exposed" or something like that
then the website was updated with the "it wasn't my fault!!!!!! i'm not the bad one!!!" message

and that's what you missed on glee
20
Posts: 13179
Date: 13-11-2016 03:30
Account deleted




wrote:
Warden wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Warden wrote:
the 'accomplice' is getting 'exposed' tomorrow so
eh I call b/s really xD
like why wait till tomorrow? rat that bitch out now if you're that pissed off. 
otherwise it sounds like it's just to build up the dramatics
yeah lol
or the so called accomplice would give themswlves up to avoid the whole thing :-p
at least we'll know who they wanna fram lmao
true. 
slightly worrying though about that, I mean me personally - if they tried it on me I'd be so upset. I'll be upset if they honestly frame someone cause it's gonna be so hard to escape from. 
Date: 13-11-2016 03:31
Private
International Star



MsNoName wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
MsNoName wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
but you said they told you to. it's oddly specific not just "i'm gonna keep checking to see if they say who they are"
Maybe english isn't her first language and she didn't know how to properly express what she meant.
don't overanalyze
I considered that but, as an English language native & student, it's still specific to put that at the front of your sentence "they said". It's something hard to get mixed up really but idk. 
and sometimes non-native english speakers makes mistakes in their writing
19
Posts: 3971
Date: 13-11-2016 03:31
Kink
Popstar



Kink wrote:
Kaitlin wrote:
Kink wrote:
ok someone fill me in on whats happened and what has been said i cant be arsed to read through 19 pages
"ET" came out with a thread saying everything was resolved
plot twist it was the hacker and they released new codes and w/e
then the website was updated with a thing saying like "that code wasn't supposed to come out my accomplice will be exposed" or something like that
then the website was updated with the "it wasn't my fault!!!!!! i'm not the bad one!!!" message

and that's what you missed on glee
man wtf so much drama
19
Posts: 11361
Date: 13-11-2016 03:31
Cuta
Streetmusician



Cuta wrote:
I do think if we all get together and make different groups for us to find clues. Then, with all the clues gathered, we could find this user and then decided how bad of a punishment we think we she or he, (even though the website says it all), I do think it depends on her/his punishment by how long this happens like 1 day = 1 week.
10
Posts: 98
Date: 13-11-2016 03:31
Private
World Famous



remains wrote:
Kink wrote:
ok someone fill me in on whats happened and what has been said i cant be arsed to read through 19 pages

ok well the hacker gave out one code, some time later the website said something like 'that last code wasnt supposed to be up till tomorrow, my accomplice betrayed me i'm gonna expose them tomorrow'
now the website says "I am so sorry. I didn't mean to, and if she "exposes" me tomorrow, know that it's not my fault.I emailed her, I got carried away. To prove myself to her and to know her identity, I had to
get the ET account again. I did, but she lied and now won't tell me who she is. She is also
liying. she gave me the code! She told me to post it! I AM NOT THE BAD ONE HERE SHE IS. BAN
HER"
22
Posts: 41714
Date: 13-11-2016 03:32
Aisaenic
Princess of Pop



Aisaenic wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
FifthAisling wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
eh I call b/s really xD
like why wait till tomorrow? rat that bitch out now if you're that pissed off. 
otherwise it sounds like it's just to build up the dramatics
yeah, like what are they waiting for?
to see if they can sort out their personal argument? hmmmmmmm -.-
truue. 
plus with that fake ass crying statement - I would've ratted them out there and then if I'd had the chance to still update the website!! Like, if it's real - why wait? o.o
cos there's that possibility of them being ratted out too :/ it sounds like the purple font writer doesn't know the other persons identity but the other person does
but why would they think of changing the font color? that's too calculated, i think it's just the same person
since her dialogue is off, it sounds like one english speaker and one less of an english speaker
but usually ppl don't connect and plan together like that 
22
Posts: 19311
Date: 13-11-2016 03:33
Account deleted




wrote:
VintageBeauty wrote:
You know even if the "other" person felt bad, as they explained in the website, they would've done more than just delete the picture with the codes. They should have deleted the other codes on the website as well. Why didn't they delete the codes typed on the website as well? That makes no sense if they want to "repent." Along with the fact that they should have revealed themselves too. If their is a second person anyway.

I just find that whole thing fishy
same, they would've exposed who the person was which shows either a) it's for dramatics or b) it's one person
Date: 13-11-2016 03:33
Kink
Popstar



Kink wrote:
Warden wrote:
Kink wrote:
ok someone fill me in on whats happened and what has been said i cant be arsed to read through 19 pages

ok well the hacker gave out one code, some time later the website said something like 'that last code wasnt supposed to be up till tomorrow, my accomplice betrayed me i'm gonna expose them tomorrow'
now the website says "I am so sorry. I didn't mean to, and if she "exposes" me tomorrow, know that it's not my fault.I emailed her, I got carried away. To prove myself to her and to know her identity, I had to
get the ET account again. I did, but she lied and now won't tell me who she is. She is also
liying. she gave me the code! She told me to post it! I AM NOT THE BAD ONE HERE SHE IS. BAN
HER"
woah this is so dramatic holy shit
19
Posts: 11361
Date: 13-11-2016 03:33
Private
World Famous



remains wrote:
kaitlin beat me to it lol
22
Posts: 41714
Date: 13-11-2016 03:33
Kink
Popstar



Kink wrote:
Warden wrote:
kaitlin beat me to it lol
yeah but urs was different than hers so like 
i learned a lot from both of u
19
Posts: 11361
Date: 13-11-2016 03:33
Account deleted




wrote:
Kaitlin wrote:
Kink wrote:
ok someone fill me in on whats happened and what has been said i cant be arsed to read through 19 pages
"ET" came out with a thread saying everything was resolved
plot twist it was the hacker and they released new codes and w/e
then the website was updated with a thing saying like "that code wasn't supposed to come out my accomplice will be exposed" or something like that
then the website was updated with the "it wasn't my fault!!!!!! i'm not the bad one!!!" message

and that's what you missed on glee
<33
Date: 13-11-2016 03:34
May02
Popstar



may02 wrote:
VintageBeauty wrote:
You know even if the "other" person felt bad, as they explained in the website, they would've done more than just delete the picture with the codes. They should have deleted the other codes on the website as well. Why didn't they delete the codes typed on the website as well? That makes no sense if they want to "repent." Along with the fact that they should have revealed themselves too. If their is a second person anyway.

I just find that whole thing fishy
TRU
17
Posts: 26942
Date: 13-11-2016 03:34
Mice
Popstar



Mice wrote:
VintageBeauty wrote:
You know even if the "other" person felt bad, as they explained in the website, they would've done more than just delete the picture with the codes. They should have deleted the other codes on the website as well. Why didn't they delete the codes typed on the website as well? That makes no sense if they want to "repent." Along with the fact that they should have revealed themselves too. If their is a second person anyway.

I just find that whole thing fishy
yes 
22
Posts: 15090
Date: 13-11-2016 03:34
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use