And the new members of FT are.... - Forum

Callum
World Famous

callum wrote:
congrats 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

Felinearc
Youtube Star

felinearc wrote:
congrats!!

Private
Popstar

Koolaid wrote:
CONGRATS EVERYONE OMG

Account deleted

wrote:
Thanks everyone ^^

Account deleted

wrote:
Congrats!!

TheWayfaringStranger
Queen of Queens

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:
Bumping this for anyone who hasn't seen it. (:

Private
Popstar

Absolute wrote:
GZ! BELIAL and all others!

Account deleted

wrote:
You could just say someone was originally going to be part of the team, but circumstances made him not make it to the top 5 after all.

- post modified by chandelier

TheWayfaringStranger
Queen of Queens

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:

ButterflyCry wrote:
You could just say someone was originally going to be part of the team, but circumstances made him not make it to the top 5 after all.

I was also using it as a reminder that your behavior on VP effects whether or not you make it onto a team. Could I have worded it differently? Sure, but I thought this would be the most effective way to get the message across.

- post modified by chandelier

Account deleted

wrote:

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:

ButterflyCry wrote:
You could just say someone was originally going to be part of the team, but circumstances made him not make it to the top 5 after all.

I was also using it as a reminder that your behavior on VP effects whether or not you make it onto a team. Could I have worded it differently? Sure, but I thought this would be the most effective way to get the message across.

It's none of anybody's business why he won't be accepted into the team. I think it's immature and unprofessional to share the reasons for someone's rejection with the rest of VP. There's probably a dozen more people that applied who didn't get picked and you're not putting those reasons out there either.

- post modified by chandelier

Fjant
Youtube Star

Fjant wrote:
bel fam <3

Callum
World Famous

callum wrote:

ButterflyCry wrote:

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:

ButterflyCry wrote:
You could just say someone was originally going to be part of the team, but circumstances made him not make it to the top 5 after all. Instead of being like oh yeah he was so disrespectful etc.

I was also using it as a reminder that your behavior on VP effects whether or not you make it onto a team. Could I have worded it differently? Sure, but I thought this would be the most effective way to get the message across.

It's none of anybody's business why he won't be accepted into the team. I think it's immature and unprofessional to share the reasons for someone's rejection with the rest of VP. There's probably a dozen more people that applied who didn't get picked and you're not putting those reasons out there either.

but those people might not be receiving their badge and then having it removed, it's only due to circumstances that they did it this way

- post modified by chandelier

Account deleted

wrote:

heathens wrote:

ButterflyCry wrote:

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:

I probably could have left out the word extremely. I was also using it as a reminder that your behavior on VP effects whether or not you make it onto a team. Could I have worded it differently? Sure, but I thought this would be the most effective way to get the message across.

It's none of anybody's business why he won't be accepted into the team. I think it's immature and unprofessional to share the reasons for someone's rejection with the rest of VP. There's probably a dozen more people that applied who didn't get picked and you're not putting those reasons out there either.

but those people might not be receiving their badge and then having it removed, it's only due to circumstances that they did it this way

Just because he might temporarily have a badge and have it removed, doesn't mean they need to publicly announce the reason for the removal. People have gotten removed off teams before and I've never seen a team share the reasons for this. If you guys can't see how this is immature then I'm glad I didn't apply to be part of FT.

-post modified by chandelier

TheWayfaringStranger
Queen of Queens

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:

heathens wrote:

ButterflyCry wrote:

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:

I probably could have left out the word extremely. I was also using it as a reminder that your behavior on VP effects whether or not you make it onto a team. Could I have worded it differently? Sure, but I thought this would be the most effective way to get the message across.

It's none of anybody's business why he won't be accepted into the team. I think it's immature and unprofessional to share the reasons for someone's rejection with the rest of VP. There's probably a dozen more people that applied who didn't get picked and you're not putting those reasons out there either.

but those people might not be receiving their badge and then having it removed, it's only due to circumstances that they did it this way

Thank you, Heathens. This is true.

@ButterflyCry, Also, I tried to state it as best as I could, but I'm not perfect. I'm sure someone else may have worded it better than I, but unfortunately it was just me doing it, right now. Also, is there a reason you always feel the need to attack people for their mistakes?

Account deleted

wrote:

TheWayfaringStranger wrote:

heathens wrote:

ButterflyCry wrote:
It's none of anybody's business why he won't be accepted into the team. I think it's immature and unprofessional to share the reasons for someone's rejection with the rest of VP. There's probably a dozen more people that applied who didn't get picked and you're not putting those reasons out there either.

but those people might not be receiving their badge and then having it removed, it's only due to circumstances that they did it this way

Thank you, Heathens. This is true.

@ButterflyCry, Also, I tried to state it as best as I could, but I'm not perfect. I'm sure someone else may have worded it better than I, but unfortunately it was just me doing it, right now. Also, is there a reason you always feel the need to attack people for their mistakes?

I'm not attacking you, I am just pointing out that it was unnecessary. Also if you realise your mistake then you could edit the first post. But you're not doing that so apparently you think your commentary is okay.