Private
Private
Private
0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.
EllieAyla wrote:
Well, 12 is just my best guess, based on the rules, how it started, how it's being promoted etc. so I might be a few years off. But it's still way too low, if you look at the current audience haha.
Revo wrote:
Kind of shocked the target audience is 10/12. I know it's controversial to say but I don't think they should even be on social media (including VP here because the forum is a main thing here). But that's just me.
EllieAyla wrote:
In my head, nothing much will change. The current audience right now seems to be aimed around the 10/12 years old. These are not facts by the way, but by seeing the rules and how it first started, it seems like a solid claim. My idea is to raise it up to 16, which is an age where teenagers become more mature and start to think a bit more logical. This is also because 80% (again, claims, not facts) is around 16 or higher.
The layout does not have to change, because I think that it's fine. I would say that harsher language is fine, however, there's still a limit. Swearing with stuff that can trigger, think about diseases, should still be a no-go. The sexual/alcohol/weed talk around 23:00 .. is something I'm not sure off. I would suggest making a new forum section, for the mature talk. Before you hop onto it, you'll get a disclaimer to warn off the younger kids. Do they proceed then it's at their own risk. This way, people can avoid it if they do not care about it and have the younger people warned. This also gives VP a safety blanket.
The team members who are below the 16 will keep their function and younger people can still join teams. It's a target audience, not a "You have to be 16+ to join". I hope that this is a bit more clear?
Thanks for explaining. I agree with everything you said, I would support this. Revo wrote:
Maybe you should make a detailed plan or something. I have no idea what the current target audience is or what you want the target audience to be? I also have no idea what will happen to the site if I support this idea. Will the layout change? Are we going to be able to discuss certain stuff before 23:00? Is harsher language suddenly ok? Will the focus of the site change? ect. I'm sure I'm missing far more important questions. But yeah I'd like to know exactly what would be changing before I show support for mayor changes like this.
Maybe you should make a detailed plan or something. I have no idea what the current target audience is or what you want the target audience to be? I also have no idea what will happen to the site if I support this idea. Will the layout change? Are we going to be able to discuss certain stuff before 23:00? Is harsher language suddenly ok? Will the focus of the site change? ect. I'm sure I'm missing far more important questions. But yeah I'd like to know exactly what would be changing before I show support for mayor changes like this.
In my head, nothing much will change. The current audience right now seems to be aimed around the 10/12 years old. These are not facts by the way, but by seeing the rules and how it first started, it seems like a solid claim. My idea is to raise it up to 16, which is an age where teenagers become more mature and start to think a bit more logical. This is also because 80% (again, claims, not facts) is around 16 or higher.
The layout does not have to change, because I think that it's fine. I would say that harsher language is fine, however, there's still a limit. Swearing with stuff that can trigger, think about diseases, should still be a no-go. The sexual/alcohol/weed talk around 23:00 .. is something I'm not sure off. I would suggest making a new forum section, for the mature talk. Before you hop onto it, you'll get a disclaimer to warn off the younger kids. Do they proceed then it's at their own risk. This way, people can avoid it if they do not care about it and have the younger people warned. This also gives VP a safety blanket.
The team members who are below the 16 will keep their function and younger people can still join teams. It's a target audience, not a "You have to be 16+ to join". I hope that this is a bit more clear?
Kind of shocked the target audience is 10/12. I know it's controversial to say but I don't think they should even be on social media (including VP here because the forum is a main thing here). But that's just me.
Well, 12 is just my best guess, based on the rules, how it started, how it's being promoted etc. so I might be a few years off. But it's still way too low, if you look at the current audience haha.
4
if they will. im proberly gonna quit, cause i will lose alot of money :c
if the already ing items wont be deleted, then im happy again xD. I think that was what people was most angry about (some people)
