You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 hi mp seller!! please send bg of white hmm hair thanks
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
17 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Ideas < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Poll: What do you think the target age should be?
Show results
Target audience of VP?
Undyne
Youtube star



Undyne wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Undyne wrote:
TheWayfaringStranger wrote:
This is true. It was never clearly defined what the target audience was (or at least it's never been clear to me). I always got the feeling it was around age 13.  I was just going with what Butterflycry said, which could be incorrect. 
yeah i don't think kaj or miranda has ever explicitly said a target audience age. especially with rules about cussing and how much sexual situations can be talked about, i would be surprised if it wasnt already 13+. 
True. I feel this shows they really should state what the age is because it is misleading as a large amount of the topics are about stuff that 12- really shouldn't view and swearing is in pretty much every single thread (even ButterflyCry when she was arguing about why Mugi was in the wrong for a 10-16 demographic). 
yeah exactly, i called her out on it. i don't think this site was ever intended for kids under 13, and i don't think they'll ever shift to that demographic bc of how old the community already is. 
17
Posts: 4433
Date: 07-11-2016 01:00
TheWayfaringStranger
Queen of Queens



TheWayfaringStranger wrote:
Undyne wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
+16 and force them to sign up through FB so they cant fake their age (I know you can just make a fake FB profile but less people would actually wanna bother with that). Although this should only count for new accounts created after implementation (if it ever is)
although a lot of people choose not to use fb even if they are over 16, i think we should just say an age and if kids below that age decide to join, they read the rules and it's on them/their parents.
I agree with Undyne. 
20
Posts: 31056
Date: 07-11-2016 01:00
EtEllerAndet
Youtube star



EtEllerAndet wrote:
Undyne wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
+16 and force them to sign up through FB so they cant fake their age (I know you can just make a fake FB profile but less people would actually wanna bother with that). Although this should only count for new accounts created after implementation (if it ever is)
although a lot of people choose not to use fb even if they are over 16, i think we should just say an age and if kids below that age decide to join, they read the rules and it's on them/their parents.
If they dont have FB they shouldnt even be able to join then... That was my point :p
18
Posts: 2261
Date: 07-11-2016 01:00
Euforia
Streetmusician



Euforia wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
+16 and force them to sign up through FB so they cant fake their age (I know you can just make a fake FB profile but less people would actually wanna bother with that). Although this should only count for new accounts created after implementation (if it ever is)
LMAO personally i will not put my personal facebook in this game that's a bit exagerated you don't want my passport too
*sarcasm*
16
Posts: 1988
Date: 07-11-2016 01:01
Private
National star



legohouse wrote:
I don't think it matters what the target audience is because if you wanna join, you're gonna join regardless of an age. Idk how this website is 10-16
18
Posts: 10310
Date: 07-11-2016 01:01
EtEllerAndet
Youtube star



EtEllerAndet wrote:
Euforia wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
+16 and force them to sign up through FB so they cant fake their age (I know you can just make a fake FB profile but less people would actually wanna bother with that). Although this should only count for new accounts created after implementation (if it ever is)
LMAO personally i will not put my personal facebook in this game that's a bit exagerated you don't want my passport too
*sarcasm*
Using FB for sign-up doesnt mean it pulls every little bit of information. It could simply be age and location... Not name, picture etc. (I mean, idk if thats possible, or if it would pull all information by default, but assuming it is)
18
Posts: 2261
Date: 07-11-2016 01:02
Account deleted




wrote:
legohouse wrote:
I don't think it matters what the target audience is because if you wanna join, you're gonna join regardless of an age. Idk how this website is 10-16
It does but an age limit means it's not the website's fault if things aren't age appropriate as it's the kids' fault for joining, not VP's. 
Date: 07-11-2016 01:03
Undyne
Youtube star



Undyne wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
Undyne wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
+16 and force them to sign up through FB so they cant fake their age (I know you can just make a fake FB profile but less people would actually wanna bother with that). Although this should only count for new accounts created after implementation (if it ever is)
although a lot of people choose not to use fb even if they are over 16, i think we should just say an age and if kids below that age decide to join, they read the rules and it's on them/their parents.
If they dont have FB they shouldnt even be able to join then... That was my point
i don't think it's in kaj and miranda's best interest to exclude everyone who doesn't have a facebook, especially when advertising through the new app coming. they want as many players as possible and excluding it to a small target market of people would not be the best idea
17
Posts: 4433
Date: 07-11-2016 01:04
Account deleted




wrote:
Undyne wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Undyne wrote:
yeah i don't think kaj or miranda has ever explicitly said a target audience age. especially with rules about cussing and how much sexual situations can be talked about, i would be surprised if it wasnt already 13+. 
True. I feel this shows they really should state what the age is because it is misleading as a large amount of the topics are about stuff that 12- really shouldn't view and swearing is in pretty much every single thread (even ButterflyCry when she was arguing about why Mugi was in the wrong for a 10-16 demographic). 
yeah exactly, i called her out on it. i don't think this site was ever intended for kids under 13, and i don't think they'll ever shift to that demographic bc of how old the community already is. 
I thought that was you! I loved your response btw <3 I feel maybe in it's origin it may have been intended but as ex-GSM users got older, the intention changed and laxed (my personal view). Exactly. It'd be stupid for them to backtrack now anyway as it'd mean basically wiping the site due to the clothes/skins/forums etc. that don't meet the 10-16 requirement.
Date: 07-11-2016 01:06
EtEllerAndet
Youtube star



EtEllerAndet wrote:
Undyne wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
Undyne wrote:
although a lot of people choose not to use fb even if they are over 16, i think we should just say an age and if kids below that age decide to join, they read the rules and it's on them/their parents.
If they dont have FB they shouldnt even be able to join then... That was my point
i don't think it's in kaj and miranda's best interest to exclude everyone who doesn't have a facebook, especially when advertising through the new app coming. they want as many players as possible and excluding it to a small target market of people would not be the best idea
Only a handful of ppl doesnt have fb tho... oh well, we'll see what happens #summer2k17
18
Posts: 2261
Date: 07-11-2016 01:07
Account deleted




wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
Euforia wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
+16 and force them to sign up through FB so they cant fake their age (I know you can just make a fake FB profile but less people would actually wanna bother with that). Although this should only count for new accounts created after implementation (if it ever is)
LMAO personally i will not put my personal facebook in this game that's a bit exagerated you don't want my passport too
*sarcasm*
Using FB for sign-up doesnt mean it pulls every little bit of information. It could simply be age and location... Not name, picture etc. (I mean, idk if thats possible, or if it would pull all information by default, but assuming it is)
For me I'd be thinking more people I know would see that I'm on VP, rather than what information it gives them. 
I prefer to keep my online self separate from reality. 
Date: 07-11-2016 01:07
Undyne
Youtube star



Undyne wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Undyne wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
True. I feel this shows they really should state what the age is because it is misleading as a large amount of the topics are about stuff that 12- really shouldn't view and swearing is in pretty much every single thread (even ButterflyCry when she was arguing about why Mugi was in the wrong for a 10-16 demographic). 
yeah exactly, i called her out on it. i don't think this site was ever intended for kids under 13, and i don't think they'll ever shift to that demographic bc of how old the community already is. 
I thought that was you! I loved your response btw <3 I feel maybe in it's origin it may have been intended but as ex-GSM users got older, the intention changed and laxed (my personal view). Exactly. It'd be stupid for them to backtrack now anyway as it'd mean basically wiping the site due to the clothes/skins/forums etc. that don't meet the 10-16 requirement.
yeah, 10 is too young for this site, but if it's outlined that we intend for 13+ on here and they decide to join anyway, that's a risk they decide to accept. not everyone is going to follow the rules and people need to realize that.
17
Posts: 4433
Date: 07-11-2016 01:08
TheWayfaringStranger
Queen of Queens



TheWayfaringStranger wrote:
Undyne wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Undyne wrote:
yeah exactly, i called her out on it. i don't think this site was ever intended for kids under 13, and i don't think they'll ever shift to that demographic bc of how old the community already is. 
I thought that was you! I loved your response btw <3 I feel maybe in it's origin it may have been intended but as ex-GSM users got older, the intention changed and laxed (my personal view). Exactly. It'd be stupid for them to backtrack now anyway as it'd mean basically wiping the site due to the clothes/skins/forums etc. that don't meet the 10-16 requirement.
yeah, 10 is too young for this site, but if it's outlined that we intend for 13+ on here and they decide to join anyway, that's a risk they decide to accept. not everyone is going to follow the rules and people need to realize that.
That's true. 
20
Posts: 31056
Date: 07-11-2016 01:09
EtEllerAndet
Youtube star



EtEllerAndet wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
EtEllerAndet wrote:
Euforia wrote:
LMAO personally i will not put my personal facebook in this game that's a bit exagerated you don't want my passport too
*sarcasm*
Using FB for sign-up doesnt mean it pulls every little bit of information. It could simply be age and location... Not name, picture etc. (I mean, idk if thats possible, or if it would pull all information by default, but assuming it is)
For me I'd be thinking more people I know would see that I'm on VP, rather than what information it gives them. 
I prefer to keep my online self separate from reality. 
Websites that use FB for sign up usually (always) only pulls information that you would normally use (name, age, mail etc.) - it wouldnt actually show anything on your FB about VP (it always says something like "This does not allow the app. to post anything on your FB" )
18
Posts: 2261
Date: 07-11-2016 01:10 | Times changed: 2
Account deleted




wrote:
Undyne wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Undyne wrote:
yeah exactly, i called her out on it. i don't think this site was ever intended for kids under 13, and i don't think they'll ever shift to that demographic bc of how old the community already is. 
I thought that was you! I loved your response btw <3 I feel maybe in it's origin it may have been intended but as ex-GSM users got older, the intention changed and laxed (my personal view). Exactly. It'd be stupid for them to backtrack now anyway as it'd mean basically wiping the site due to the clothes/skins/forums etc. that don't meet the 10-16 requirement.
yeah, 10 is too young for this site, but if it's outlined that we intend for 13+ on here and they decide to join anyway, that's a risk they decide to accept. not everyone is going to follow the rules and people need to realize that.
Yeah my thoughts exactly. Those standards are pretty much regulation on all other sites I've played as a kid, I don't see why people think it'd be such a big deal to add them here 
Date: 07-11-2016 01:11
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use