You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Kuunsirpale
Selling wd/Looking wl!!!
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
12 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Ideas < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Poll: <3
Show results
How to help kaj // re: his design thread
Eifos
World famous



Eifos wrote:
devilcake wrote:
Eifos wrote:
devilcake wrote:
Re designing sprites and stuff in the existing VP games so they don’t look like they were made in like paint in 2005  would be pretty rad
Maybe people on vp could help with that?
I think it could make a nice competition
ooooh that is such a neato idea! VP is full of so many creative people, it'd probably end up looking super nice!
We just need to sell the idea to Kaj and maybe ET
17
Posts: 5452
Date: 18-03-2018 19:40
Account deleted




wrote:
Nyctophile wrote:
I feel like people were being a little rude and mean to kaj, I understand that people are angry but Damn, people could have been a little bit more understanding especially to the fact that he really opened up a people started indirect/direct attacking him lmao idek why I care but I feel bad because he ended up clicking the threads.

I want people to know though we shouldn’t be horrible about him because without kaj: 
1.The game wouldn’t exist
2.we wouldn’t know eachother 
3. The teams would have been given the chance to take on the responsibilities that they have 
4. Designers probably wouldn’t have been given the chance to create clothing here for people to appreciate and wear 
5. We wouldn’t have been given a chance to Aquire the friends we have, unless you all played the same games like inch or something 

i can understand the frustration but we also have to be greatful.
yes, but he's been this way since the site opened - at least in my experience, he's been like this for 2 years.
The only good thing that's happened in that time? Startalk - and I'm like 85% sure that was only pushed further because Kim wanted it. 
Date: 18-03-2018 19:41
Account deleted




wrote:
Claire wrote:
OK I broke down every post from Kaj's thread. Some posts fit into two categories and so were counted that way.

Comments that were just "oh wow" or "lol" nonresponses, swearing, and SNARK: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj using 'he' on mistake: IIIIII
Comments criticising the profit that we don't even know for sure Kaj makes: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a mean way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a nice way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments that point out how dumb everyone was being or defending Kaj: IIIIII
Comments that were just memes probably?: IIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj's poor English skills: IIII
Comments questioning Kaj's Manhood or calling him Child: IIIIII

Feel free to go thru and count the posts up differently. This is how I saw it personally. I might have missed a comment or two, by page seven I was ready to quit counting. 

My point is, it was more mean than nice, it was more useless snark than actual critique. OF course he locked the thread. Ya'll were literally bullying the guy. There were only about five people there who were being mature about the situation. 

Maybe if we actually critiqued instead of just being mean it would have gone differently?
I agree
Date: 18-03-2018 19:42
Account deleted




wrote:
Claire wrote:
OK I broke down every post from Kaj's thread. Some posts fit into two categories and so were counted that way.

Comments that were just "oh wow" or "lol" nonresponses, swearing, and SNARK: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj using 'he' on mistake: IIIIII
Comments criticising the profit that we don't even know for sure Kaj makes: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a mean way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a nice way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments that point out how dumb everyone was being or defending Kaj: IIIIII
Comments that were just memes probably?: IIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj's poor English skills: IIII
Comments questioning Kaj's Manhood or calling him Child: IIIIII

Feel free to go thru and count the posts up differently. This is how I saw it personally. I might have missed a comment or two, by page seven I was ready to quit counting. 

My point is, it was more mean than nice, it was more useless snark than actual critique. OF course he locked the thread. Ya'll were literally bullying the guy. There were only about five people there who were being mature about the situation. 

Maybe if we actually critiqued instead of just being mean it would have gone differently?
When did that last work?
Date: 18-03-2018 19:42
Private
World famous



Claire wrote:
Quinzelle wrote:
Claire wrote:
OK I broke down every post from Kaj's thread. Some posts fit into two categories and so were counted that way.

Comments that were just "oh wow" or "lol" nonresponses, swearing, and SNARK: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj using 'he' on mistake: IIIIII
Comments criticising the profit that we don't even know for sure Kaj makes: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a mean way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a nice way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments that point out how dumb everyone was being or defending Kaj: IIIIII
Comments that were just memes probably?: IIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj's poor English skills: IIII
Comments questioning Kaj's Manhood or calling him Child: IIIIII

Feel free to go thru and count the posts up differently. This is how I saw it personally. I might have missed a comment or two, by page seven I was ready to quit counting. 

My point is, it was more mean than nice, it was more useless snark than actual critique. OF course he locked the thread. Ya'll were literally bullying the guy. There were only about five people there who were being mature about the situation. 

Maybe if we actually critiqued instead of just being mean it would have gone differently?
When did that last work?
I don't know. As long as I have been here people have been downright mean to the guy and that clearly isn't working either. 
21
Posts: 55674
Date: 18-03-2018 19:43
Private
Popstar



Horcrux wrote:
I'm away for dinner but will update the main post when I'm home! 
19
Posts: 23337
Date: 18-03-2018 19:49
Account deleted




wrote:
Claire wrote:
OK I broke down every post from Kaj's thread. Some posts fit into two categories and so were counted that way.

Comments that were just "oh wow" or "lol" nonresponses, swearing, and SNARK: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj using 'he' on mistake: IIIIII
Comments criticising the profit that we don't even know for sure Kaj makes: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a mean way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a nice way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments that point out how dumb everyone was being or defending Kaj: IIIIII
Comments that were just memes probably?: IIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj's poor English skills: IIII
Comments questioning Kaj's Manhood or calling him Child: IIIIII

Feel free to go thru and count the posts up differently. This is how I saw it personally. I might have missed a comment or two, by page seven I was ready to quit counting. 

My point is, it was more mean than nice, it was more useless snark than actual critique. OF course he locked the thread. Ya'll were literally bullying the guy. There were only about five people there who were being mature about the situation. 

Maybe if we actually critiqued instead of just being mean it would have gone differently?

exactly omg
Date: 18-03-2018 19:55
Kaprylz
Youtube star



Kaprylz wrote:
punch wrote:
Claire wrote:
OK I broke down every post from Kaj's thread. Some posts fit into two categories and so were counted that way.

Comments that were just "oh wow" or "lol" nonresponses, swearing, and SNARK: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj using 'he' on mistake: IIIIII
Comments criticising the profit that we don't even know for sure Kaj makes: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a mean way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a nice way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments that point out how dumb everyone was being or defending Kaj: IIIIII
Comments that were just memes probably?: IIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj's poor English skills: IIII
Comments questioning Kaj's Manhood or calling him Child: IIIIII

Feel free to go thru and count the posts up differently. This is how I saw it personally. I might have missed a comment or two, by page seven I was ready to quit counting. 

My point is, it was more mean than nice, it was more useless snark than actual critique. OF course he locked the thread. Ya'll were literally bullying the guy. There were only about five people there who were being mature about the situation. 

Maybe if we actually critiqued instead of just being mean it would have gone differently?
I agree
I agree too
17
Posts: 2782
Date: 18-03-2018 20:09
Account deleted




wrote:
Claire wrote:
OK I broke down every post from Kaj's thread. Some posts fit into two categories and so were counted that way.

Comments that were just "oh wow" or "lol" nonresponses, swearing, and SNARK: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj using 'he' on mistake: IIIIII
Comments criticising the profit that we don't even know for sure Kaj makes: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a mean way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actual Constructive Criticism said in a nice way: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Comments that point out how dumb everyone was being or defending Kaj: IIIIII
Comments that were just memes probably?: IIIIIIII
Comments making fun of Kaj's poor English skills: IIII
Comments questioning Kaj's Manhood or calling him Child: IIIIII

Feel free to go thru and count the posts up differently. This is how I saw it personally. I might have missed a comment or two, by page seven I was ready to quit counting. 

My point is, it was more mean than nice, it was more useless snark than actual critique. OF course he locked the thread. Ya'll were literally bullying the guy. There were only about five people there who were being mature about the situation. 

Maybe if we actually critiqued instead of just being mean it would have gone differently?
the comments about his english had my eyes rolling to the back of my head
Date: 18-03-2018 20:13
Pastelice
National star



pastelice wrote:
what was the link to the original thread?
17
Posts: 4185
Date: 18-03-2018 20:19
Account deleted




wrote:
pastelice wrote:
what was the link to the original thread?
It’s been closed now anyway x
Date: 18-03-2018 21:24
HeyitsKarlee
Youtube star



HeyitsKarlee wrote:
we need to be able to favorite more outfits
16
Posts: 9308
Date: 18-03-2018 21:26
Account deleted




wrote:
Suggestions: 
 1. Just because solovey’s Designs are a very good quality doesn’t mean they have to be the most expensive especially when it comes to the credit set week like Jesus! 
Date: 18-03-2018 21:30
HeyitsKarlee
Youtube star



HeyitsKarlee wrote:
Nyctophile wrote:
Suggestions: 
 1. Just because solovey’s Designs are a very good quality doesn’t mean they have to be the most expensive especially when it comes to the credit set week like Jesus! 
well solovey has a contract with kaj so maybe
16
Posts: 9308
Date: 18-03-2018 21:31
WRENCH
Youtube star



WRENCH wrote:
punch wrote:
vex wrote:
punch wrote:
but it's nice to get shop updates some times as well :C
thats true, but tbh we dont really need hall of fame outfits
I'd rather have regular shop updates and wof items then an extra outfit that like 3 ig coz males and females share the same winner pool 
yeah that's true
Id be very happy if makes and females got separate lists tbh. With the HOF thing
18
Posts: 24807
Date: 18-03-2018 21:35
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use