IPL? anyone with experience - Forum

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

tamako wrote:

Abby wrote:

Sobbing wrote:
that sounds like a sensory nightmare to me and 1k is alot

but russians in beautycare r the best, manicures, spas, etc!! u got lucky
i could not imagine getting naked for a treatment, its usually way worse than u imagine it to be and i get that but i would probably go for laser treatment in person if IPL doesnt work, u are brave and im glad it ended up working for you
also ipl works on veins?? i did not know that

and the fact that ur friend is gonna be ur flowergirl

so cute goddammit, when is ur wedding

oh it was for me as well but I hated being hairy more somehow lmao
agreed, I trust russian beautycare ladies the must, then again I must be biased lmao

Honestly for me it was like the opposite, she was super professional and it was a breeze by the 2nd time
and thank you! I did feel like I overcame a big fear of mine with that

Yep! IPL works on on vericose, birthmarks, sun spots and discoloration, it is much better I think? for the face seeing as it is gentler than laser so we love to see it

yeah ahaha she asked me that like.... 5 years ago and now that I am planning an actual wedding
we don't know yet! we actually got married 5 days ago in a small and intimate civil wedding, but the bigger plan is much later down the line, 2 years at LEAST from now

It's wonderful, congratulations!!

thank you

Private
National star

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:
IVISKIN seems to be around the same specs as the Ulike, and it also has cooling protection so that seems good,
both me and her think it seems to be a good device

Wavelengths: 640 nm–1100 nm.
Plug: 100–240V

Comforth also seems good, no cooling protection but it the specs are almost the same as the IVISKIN and ULIKE

Energy level: 1,5-3,9 J/cm^3
Wavelength: 470-1100 nm
Adapter: 100-240V AC Input
12V3A/2,5 A Dc Output

She said that if all of them are the same specifications wise, she'd calculate shipping and prices and see what's the cheapest, then see how many reviews she can find of them all, and if the ones with the cooling is cheaper as she is sensitive to burn pain

im honestly so lost

ive been looking into energy levels and outputs and most of them dont list anything!!! ulike specifies an output of 2.4-7.4j/cm2 and if what u posted on the comforth is true its like 2x weaker
ugh this is frustrating to research

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:
IVISKIN seems to be around the same specs as the Ulike, and it also has cooling protection so that seems good,
both me and her think it seems to be a good device

Wavelengths: 640 nm–1100 nm.
Plug: 100–240V

Comforth also seems good, no cooling protection but it the specs are almost the same as the IVISKIN and ULIKE

Energy level: 1,5-3,9 J/cm^3
Wavelength: 470-1100 nm
Adapter: 100-240V AC Input
12V3A/2,5 A Dc Output

She said that if all of them are the same specifications wise, she'd calculate shipping and prices and see what's the cheapest, then see how many reviews she can find of them all, and if the ones with the cooling is cheaper as she is sensitive to burn pain

im honestly so lost

ive been looking into energy levels and outputs and most of them dont list anything!!! ulike specifies an output of 2.4-7.4j/cm2 and if what u posted on the comforth is true its like 2x weaker
ugh this is frustrating to research

Id say the best way is to try going to the website and try to talk to an agent on the chat function, atm it's a holiday here so idk if agents would work rn but you could try there

Private
National star

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:
IVISKIN seems to be around the same specs as the Ulike, and it also has cooling protection so that seems good,
both me and her think it seems to be a good device

Wavelengths: 640 nm–1100 nm.
Plug: 100–240V

Comforth also seems good, no cooling protection but it the specs are almost the same as the IVISKIN and ULIKE

Energy level: 1,5-3,9 J/cm^3
Wavelength: 470-1100 nm
Adapter: 100-240V AC Input
12V3A/2,5 A Dc Output

She said that if all of them are the same specifications wise, she'd calculate shipping and prices and see what's the cheapest, then see how many reviews she can find of them all, and if the ones with the cooling is cheaper as she is sensitive to burn pain

im honestly so lost

ive been looking into energy levels and outputs and most of them dont list anything!!! ulike specifies an output of 2.4-7.4j/cm2 and if what u posted on the comforth is true its like 2x weaker
ugh this is frustrating to research

Id say the best way is to try going to the website and try to talk to an agent on the chat function, atm it's a holiday here so idk if agents would work rn but you could try there

i did !! this is comforth

the iviskin is 5,5 J/cm2 at maximum output

how do i even compare cm3 to cm2
doesnt cm3 measure density

Private
National star

Sobbing wrote:
im making this way harder than it should be why cant i just buy a product instead of researching so i know i get the best bang for the buck

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:

Sobbing wrote:
im honestly so lost

ive been looking into energy levels and outputs and most of them dont list anything!!! ulike specifies an output of 2.4-7.4j/cm2 and if what u posted on the comforth is true its like 2x weaker
ugh this is frustrating to research

Id say the best way is to try going to the website and try to talk to an agent on the chat function, atm it's a holiday here so idk if agents would work rn but you could try there

i did !! this is comforth

the iviskin is 5,5 J/cm2 at maximum output

how do i even compare cm3 to cm2
doesnt cm3 measure density

I'm not the best with those measurements and neither is me friend but I think?
it's j=joultes
cm= square centimeter
so how many joultes go on a square cm or cubic cm

Private
National star

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:
Id say the best way is to try going to the website and try to talk to an agent on the chat function, atm it's a holiday here so idk if agents would work rn but you could try there

i did !! this is comforth

the iviskin is 5,5 J/cm2 at maximum output

how do i even compare cm3 to cm2
doesnt cm3 measure density

I'm not the best with those measurements and neither is me friend but I think?
it's j=joultes
cm= square centimeter
so how many joultes go on a square cm or cubic cm

yes but cm3 is not only area but also density
it measures not only size but brings in another dimension
im not math person this is tough

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:

Sobbing wrote:
i did !! this is comforth

the iviskin is 5,5 J/cm2 at maximum output

how do i even compare cm3 to cm2
doesnt cm3 measure density

I'm not the best with those measurements and neither is me friend but I think?
it's j=joultes
cm= square centimeter
so how many joultes go on a square cm or cubic cm

yes but cm3 is not only area but also density
it measures not only size but brings in another dimension
im not math person this is tough

that I actually do not know and I taught math before lmao
I'd say more volume on skin? or into the skin? xcompared to cm2

Private
National star

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:
I'm not the best with those measurements and neither is me friend but I think?
it's j=joultes
cm= square centimeter
so how many joultes go on a square cm or cubic cm

yes but cm3 is not only area but also density
it measures not only size but brings in another dimension
im not math person this is tough

that I actually do not know and I taught math before lmao
I'd say more volume on skin? or into the skin? xcompared to cm2

i mean yeah it measures volume but how the fuck would you measure volume on a joule

i messaged them and straight up asked how does cm2 compare to cm3 and which one is stronger i give up

Private
National star

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:

Sobbing wrote:
yes but cm3 is not only area but also density
it measures not only size but brings in another dimension
im not math person this is tough

that I actually do not know and I taught math before lmao
I'd say more volume on skin? or into the skin? xcompared to cm2

i mean yeah it measures volume but how the fuck would you measure volume on a joule

i messaged them and straight up asked how does cm2 compare to cm3 and which one is stronger i give up

i figured it out
they said its a spelling mistake
so it is cm2

Private
Minister of Pop

Arthema wrote:

Sobbing wrote:

Abby wrote:
that I actually do not know and I taught math before lmao
I'd say more volume on skin? or into the skin? xcompared to cm2

i mean yeah it measures volume but how the fuck would you measure volume on a joule

i messaged them and straight up asked how does cm2 compare to cm3 and which one is stronger i give up

i figured it out
they said its a spelling mistake
so it is cm2

LMAO wellp there you go then
it is all cm2 which makes much more sense cus surface on skin and not the volume
like I was trying to think how it could be cm3 but I guess it's impossible PFFF