Camade wrote:
hurtful wrote:
After all, there was a war. Many countries were likely involved if it's a nuclear war. I think a bunker, maybe even two for each continent is reasonable. Now, some are bigger than others and this one might be the most well-funded one. Maybe Eurasia was "the winner" in the nuclear war, having the most survivors and creating the best bunker, but surely other parts of the world had to have created solutions of their own.
(For my own sake I'm just referring to the villain as a male, but I don't have a preference and would still be fine with having the villain be a woman).
But I like the bad guy being mad at the whole corruption and injustice behind selecting the bunker-folk. That would be a great start to the movement, but as civilization falls, they need something to cling to. They need hope, some kind of order, which I imagine he was eager to create for them. A world in which there is no God because everyone is God. And that if they need guidance, if they need vengeance, if they need someone to trust and someone to seek answers from, then he is the man. Cause he knew all along. Idk, I just need a cult in every RP I do it seems.
Oh okay, I was maybe thinking too much of the first idea I introduced Ofcourse there can be more bunkers, I kind of visioned there being only one of them, internationally decided "museum of humanity", where a selected group of people wait for the Earth to clean up or a new dominant species to riseCamade wrote:
I really think he/she should have a good reason to take control over all the water...and what exactly makes his group evil? What are the problems in in, are there some contradicting values or?
I was thinking, if people were chosen to the bunker also based on their genetics (as diverse genepool as possible), mauýbe certain groups of people with hight numbers (e.g. some Asian folks) would be less likely to be selected? And if the bunker solution had been introduced around the beginning of the war, he/she might have started an "anti-racist movement" with the intention to better his/hers opportunities to get in there.
However, if he/she had this kind of background, he/she would probably have more beef with the people in the bunker rather than outside of it. But maybe his/her plan could have something to do with distroying/invading the bunker, and he would try to forcefully militarise every single person alive outside of it? And our characters might not want to be part of a revolutions, but have some other goals (e.g. destroying all of humanity outside the bunker, saving the world, creating new, coexsiting societies...). Our characters might this way face a need for help from their enemy when something goes sideways...
While I adore that idea I thought there was more than just a single bunker in the world. hurtful wrote:
Maybe we can start plotting our big-shot villain. I was thinking they were a leader of a survivalist movement that started out when nuclear-war was approaching about 20 years ago. It turned into a cult where the survivors praise them for predicting the end of the world and choosing them to be their followers that would survive the whole apocalypse. He starts controlling all clean water-sources through his followers etc.
Any thoughts?
Maybe we can start plotting our big-shot villain. I was thinking they were a leader of a survivalist movement that started out when nuclear-war was approaching about 20 years ago. It turned into a cult where the survivors praise them for predicting the end of the world and choosing them to be their followers that would survive the whole apocalypse. He starts controlling all clean water-sources through his followers etc.
Any thoughts?
I really think he/she should have a good reason to take control over all the water...and what exactly makes his group evil? What are the problems in in, are there some contradicting values or?
I was thinking, if people were chosen to the bunker also based on their genetics (as diverse genepool as possible), mauýbe certain groups of people with hight numbers (e.g. some Asian folks) would be less likely to be selected? And if the bunker solution had been introduced around the beginning of the war, he/she might have started an "anti-racist movement" with the intention to better his/hers opportunities to get in there.
However, if he/she had this kind of background, he/she would probably have more beef with the people in the bunker rather than outside of it. But maybe his/her plan could have something to do with distroying/invading the bunker, and he would try to forcefully militarise every single person alive outside of it? And our characters might not want to be part of a revolutions, but have some other goals (e.g. destroying all of humanity outside the bunker, saving the world, creating new, coexsiting societies...). Our characters might this way face a need for help from their enemy when something goes sideways...
After all, there was a war. Many countries were likely involved if it's a nuclear war. I think a bunker, maybe even two for each continent is reasonable. Now, some are bigger than others and this one might be the most well-funded one. Maybe Eurasia was "the winner" in the nuclear war, having the most survivors and creating the best bunker, but surely other parts of the world had to have created solutions of their own.
(For my own sake I'm just referring to the villain as a male, but I don't have a preference and would still be fine with having the villain be a woman).
But I like the bad guy being mad at the whole corruption and injustice behind selecting the bunker-folk. That would be a great start to the movement, but as civilization falls, they need something to cling to. They need hope, some kind of order, which I imagine he was eager to create for them. A world in which there is no God because everyone is God. And that if they need guidance, if they need vengeance, if they need someone to trust and someone to seek answers from, then he is the man. Cause he knew all along. Idk, I just need a cult in every RP I do it seems.