In-game design program - Forum

Private
Streetmusician

Cilensium wrote:
Ok after being roasted enough (jk), i see that it might be an stupid idea to limit it to just pixelated designs on an in-game design program after all. And we dont need to waste that kind of money. Hahah

Ad0xa
World Famous

ad0xa wrote:
" Also the designs would all have the same ''texture'', because they all were made in the same program "
Except that some designers still did them in photoshop (if they couldn't get the page working) and all of the gsm-paid-working artists/designers made theirs in photoshop.

.___.

I really loved the even playfield and stuff but I just don't think it would be possible here now when we already have it like this. People would complain that designers suddenly didn't hold up to their standars (bc some people can't do pixel art but they can do ps

ixel art. )

Btw. If you don't have photoshop but still want something photoshop:like you can get it for free :3
There are a lot of free programs that are like ps. ^^

Aisaenic
Princess of Pop

Aisaenic wrote:

ad0xa wrote:
" Also the designs would all have the same ''texture'', because they all were made in the same program "
Except that some designers still did them in photoshop (if they couldn't get the page working) and all of the gsm-paid-working artists/designers made theirs in photoshop.

.___.

I really loved the even playfield and stuff but I just don't think it would be possible here now when we already have it like this. People would complain that designers suddenly didn't hold up to their standars (bc some people can't do pixel art but they can do ps

ixel art. )

Btw. If you don't have photoshop but still want something photoshop:like you can get it for free :3
There are a lot of free programs that are like ps. ^^

Yesssss <3 the in game designing feature would be complicated to code for, not to mention more like a game or something

Sleepy
Popstar

sleepy wrote:
no thanks

Account deleted

wrote:
nah i think they got better things to put their money and focus on

Temple
Youtube Star

Temple wrote:
I like the items we have now

Private
World Famous

DEITY wrote:

sleepy wrote:
no thanks

Private
Streetmusician

Cilensium wrote:
Oh well then xD

Maybe this is just for us who is good at pixelated designs, and not PS.

Private
Queen of Queens

Adore wrote:
nah, i like it more that you have basically artistic freedom doing different kind of design.

CaoinicShi
National Star

CaoinicShi wrote:
I really like it the way it´s now, actually. Now they can decide to do pixel-art or do it in photoshop. So many more possibilites!

Revo
Youtube Star

Revo wrote:
Is this because some people can't get photoshop or sai? I don't get why you would want to force people to use one specific program.

Private
Streetmusician

Cilensium wrote:

Revo wrote:
Is this because some people can't get photoshop or sai? I don't get why you would want to force people to use one specific program.

Well i would not look up on it as forcing anyone to do anyting.

But of course people are going to choose PS designs over pixelated because the outcome is more realistic. And this is not fair to those who cannot do those types of designs.

But i think those who prefer PS could to that. And those who dont could use a in-game design program that allows the background to be transparent etc and fills the criterias that are for sending in designs.

Private
World Famous

Shadowjess wrote:
I'm going to have to disagree.

I love how everyone's designs have their own unique feel to it. Personally I hated the designer on gSm, even if it got me used to using pixels. Now a days I cringe when I think back to the designer and how...limited it was.

I much prefer how things are right now with everyone being able to use their own programs.

There is a designer on the Dutch server who uses MSPaint..freaking MSPAINT!

Revo
Youtube Star

Revo wrote:

Cilensium wrote:

Revo wrote:
Is this because some people can't get photoshop or sai? I don't get why you would want to force people to use one specific program.

Well i would not look up on it as forcing anyone to do anyting.

But of course people are going to choose PS designs over pixelated because the outcome is more realistic. And this is not fair to those who cannot do those types of designs.

But i think those who prefer PS could to that. And those who dont could use a in-game design program that allows the background to be transparent etc and fills the criterias that are for sending in designs.

But doesn't every pc have a basic drawing program in which you can pixalate? If you want to keep alowing both types of designs I don't get why there should be a in-game design program.

Natalye
World Famous

Natalye wrote:
Well, you needed to have Java to do designs in gsm, and lot of people couldn't make them just 'cause their java didn't work.
AND people can decide program which is easiest for them to use. And you can make layers, which is really helping.
Also i think designs won't still be similar. Everyone draws with their own style, so that wouldn't help so much.

Account deleted

wrote:

Cilensium wrote:

Revo wrote:
Is this because some people can't get photoshop or sai? I don't get why you would want to force people to use one specific program.

Well i would not look up on it as forcing anyone to do anyting.

But of course people are going to choose PS designs over pixelated because the outcome is more realistic. And this is not fair to those who cannot do those types of designs.

But i think those who prefer PS could to that. And those who dont could use a in-game design program that allows the background to be transparent etc and fills the criterias that are for sending in designs.

Why not just find a program that fits ones own style, instead of making the people who work on this site have to use money on an in-game program, that a lot of people wouldn't use?