In the past few weeks, international media as well as a surprising amount of well-known internet personalities have been covering what is currently happening in the world of professional chess. Naturally, people who normally publish chess content on YouTube, such as GothamChess and GMHikaru, have been discussing the cheating scandal. GMHikaru, Hikaru Nakamura, is a Grandmaster (GM), which is the highest possible chess title, aside from world champion, and the title is granted to players with an Elo rating above 2600 or 2700, with the latter being more common these days. GothamChess, Levy Rozman, is an International Master (IM), the rank below GM.
Additionally, bigger creators such as Charlie (MoistCr1TiKaL/penguinz0) and Ludwig (Ludwig/Mogul Mail) have both been covering the scandal. As Ludwig said in a recent video, cheating seems to be in the wind these days.
Professional chess is rarely getting the same media attention as many other professional sports and sport related events. However, what is currently happening in the world of chess is getting a lot of media attention. Now without much further ado, why is this getting attention, and what is actually happening?
The debacle started September 4th 2022, after the reigning world champion in chess, Magnus Carlsen, unexpectedly lost a match against American GM Hans Niemann at the chess tournament Sinquefield Cup in St. Louis, Missouri. At the time, Niemann was barely ranked within the top 50 players in the world, while Carlsen has been ranked as the number one player for over a decade straight. The following day, on the 5th, Carlsen withdrew from the tournament. In addition to withdrawing, Carlsen posted a message to Twitter which contained a video of the football manager JosĂ© Mourinho saying âIf I speak I am in big troubleâ. Naturally, this sort of behaviour did not go unnoticed; people were quick to interpret it as Carlsen cryptically accusing Niemann for cheating. On the 8th, Niemann denied cheating against Carlsen, while also admitting that he had cheated on the website Chess.com when he was 12 and 16 years old. Two days later, the main judge of the Sinquefield Cup stated that there were no indications that Niemann had cheated. After this, the interest in cheating accusations decreased.
However, this âcalmâ would only be temporary. On the 19th, Carlsen controversially withdrew from a game against Niemann after mere seconds, despite the match having officially started at the point. This meeting was in an online tournament, Julius Baer Generation Cup. This was immediately questioned by experts, few - if any, were capable of making sense of Carlsenâs actions at this point. Carlsenâs conduct was by many considered to be immature. On the 23rd, Carlsen was publicly criticised by the international chess federation (FIDE) in a press release. Two days later, Carlsen chose to be more explicit in his criticism of Niemann, claiming that he believes that Niemann has cheated more, and more recently, than what he has admitted. On the 29th of September, FIDE announced that both Niemann and Carlsen would be investigated. Both players risk being penalised for their conduct.
October 6th, the âChess Presidentâ of Norway admitted to cheating in a tournament which took place a few years ago. Around the same time it was revealed that a chess player in the international chess âeliteâ had been allowed to remain anonymous after Chess.com discovered that he had cheated, which also occurred a few years ago. At this stage, it does not seem unlikely that other players will either by their own admit to cheating, or be âoutedâ as cheaters in the following weeks.
People, predominantly online, have been speculating that Hans Niemann was cheating by using an electronic device inside his rear end (to describe it more âappropriatelyâ, and thus less direct). Naturally, there is no evidence whatsoever which indicates that this is in the same realm as the truth. This speculation is among the most frequently âreportedâ aspects of the ongoing cheating scandal, but it is nothing other than a wild speculation. It is worth noting, at this point, that it is difficult to find evidence Niemann has cheated in physical games, and he has only confirmed cheating in online matches. It is unclear how it is possible to cheat in physical, âover-the-boardâ, matches, but as will be covered later, there are strong indications that he has cheated more than what he has claimed to in online games.
Before discussing the presented evidence, or possible evidence, it is important to stress that cheating in chess does not equate to cheating in every single move you make. Instead, it could be cheating in only one move in a game, and it is still cheating. In online matches, cheating is easier to do because it is not always possible to tell if other people are in the room, or what the player is seeing on their screen(s). Over-the-board cheating, however, is more challenging to conduct, because it is often easier to detect if a player is cheating. Hence the absurd and wild conspiracy theory briefly covered in the previous section of this article.
Aside from the instances of cheating that Niemann has himself confirmed, other evidence for cheating has been released over the past few days. Chess.com published a 72-page report in which they claimed that Niemann likely received illegal help in over 100 online matches, including games in which prize money was at stake. These alleged instances of cheating occurred as recently as 2020, back when Niemann was 16-17 years old. It is noteworthy, however, that Chess.com is in the process of buying Magnus Carlsenâs chess oriented Play Magnus Group for more than $80 million, so some may claim that they are perhaps not a 100% unbiased source in this conflict, as it would not be ideal for them if Carlsenâs reputation suffers amidst this figurative storm.
The evidence presented is largely comparisons of the moves made by Niemann compared to the recommended moves provided by powerful supercomputers, which suggest that there may have been cheating involved. However, this type of data cannot alone without doubt prove that Niemann has cheated, even if the presented data strongly suggest that there is something rather peculiar with Niemannâs moves, simply because they are âtoo perfectâ, or more accurately âstatistically extraordinaryâ, compared to other highly ranked players and supercomputers. Notably, the possible, and very alleged, instances of cheating have all occurred in online matches, not over-the-board games, like the match Carlsen lost against Niemann on September 4th. Thus, the over-the-board matches Niemann has played does not appear to have had any clear indication of cheating. Niemannâs development as a chess player, however, is noteworthy as it clearly differs from the development of other greats in chess history, including Carlsenâs development around the same age which Niemann is currently.
When Niemann admitted to cheating on Chess.com in 2020, he was not among the âbestâ cheaters. In the Chess.com-report, they have a table where they list anonymous players who have admitted to cheating. At the time, Niemann was âonlyâ an IM, as he obtained the title of GM in 2021. In the table, Niemann is only above eight anonymous GMs who have admitted to cheating, there are 16 GMs above him. Recall from earlier that GM is the highest title in chess, and the title is for life. Thus, Niemann was well within the lower half of admitted cheaters on Chess.com at the time. Essentially, the core of the Chess.com-report is that they could not at the time find any evidence that Niemann had cheated in over-the-board games, while the more general media is focusing on the possibility that Niemann cheated in 100+ online games. The report did say that they found abnormalities in six over-the-board games, which should be further investigated. The report is not as conclusive as people would have hoped, although it clearly suggests substantial cheating online.
Hikaru Nakamura published a video where he, together with a player who has played against Niemann in multiple online games, Daniel Naroditsky, looked at a few of the games in which Niemann allegedly cheated. Nakamura commented that some of the matches which were labelled as possible instances of cheating were not obvious that it was cheating, some of the games, however, were interestingly well-played by Niemann. Nakamura views the games as appearing to be quite normal, although both Nakamura and Naroditsky add that considering that Chess.com published the report, they believe that there has to be some rather solid evidence indicating cheating.
This story is still ongoing, and more information is likely going to surface as time passes. Niemann has been temporarily banned from Chess.com, but has not faced any punishment or reaction from FIDE. As stated earlier, it is predominantly online games which have been examined for possible cheating. Up until recently, online chess games have not had the same prestige as over-the-board games, so even if Niemann is without doubt proven to have cheated online, it is uncertain what kind of effect it will have on over-the-board playing. Nevertheless, even if he is not labelled a cheater, it is possible that other players will be unwilling to play against him in the future. This will, naturally, have an impact on his future as a chess player.
Niemann is not the only person in this which may be facing consequences, Carlsen may expect some reaction from FIDE due to his unacceptable conduct. His conduct is not what one expects from a reigning world champion, and there is really no way to defend how he has approached this, even if it is the case that Niemann did cheat. Carlsen has, however, recently announced that he will not be defending his world championship title in 2023, although he intends on remaining an active player beyond that.
Essentially, this will continue until the FIDE report is published, and hopefully that report will bring clarity to this entire thing and answer all possible questions. As with everything else, it is unlikely that anything will be perfectly solved bringing satisfaction to all possible parties involved in this.
Private
Private
Private
0
0
0
0
To react to the daily news you need to be logged in.
