wrote:
but i also read he had photos of naked boys and S&M bondage pictures too
Basil wrote:
the pornography wasn't.......technically porn? like it was suggestive poses of adolescent boys but they were all clothed. still could have been used as grooming materials, but it wasn't illegal and didn't contain nudity.
yeah, i saw on those pictures on a documentry and i agree,the pornography wasn't.......technically porn? like it was suggestive poses of adolescent boys but they were all clothed. still could have been used as grooming materials, but it wasn't illegal and didn't contain nudity.
but i also read he had photos of naked boys and S&M bondage pictures too