remains wrote: it's shite innit every australian i know hates it dont you just love giving all your social security information to companies known for not keeping your information safe?
Lamby wrote: I think banning everyone from under 16 to social media is great, however, in order to succesfully do this you have to give up all of your social security information and I really do not like the idea of the government having all of this.
Luna wrote: Considering how often massive security leaks happen all across the web, I think it's a really fucking dumb idea lmfao, liiiike ;;; Yeah sure it'd be great if minors (especially really young ones) didn't have social media, but the risk isn't worth it!! Just parent your kids!!!
Luna wrote: Considering how often massive security leaks happen all across the web, I think it's a really fucking dumb idea lmfao, liiiike ;;; Yeah sure it'd be great if minors (especially really young ones) didn't have social media, but the risk isn't worth it!! Just parent your kids!!!
I agree that it is better for it to be on the parents and that if the platform finds out they are under the required age, they just get banned. I don't trust governments with this kind of info
Claire wrote: probably good in theory to keep kids off social media but in practice it's gonna be bad for like freedom and democracy and that's probably the actual goal of lawmakers setting this up.
devilcake wrote: Honestly it should just be on the site rules and regulations not legally enforced through age varification… like defo would be better if al social media was 16+ but just make it possible to report children so their accs are deleted… they’ll get around it regardless but this way it’s slightly discouraged and it doesn’t affect anyone else idk man
To join the forums you need to be logged in.
General < General
17
To load new posts: activated
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
0
0
0
0
