Limited wrote:
Alright, if I sound mean, I'm sorry. I will try to sound as neutral as I can
The past few months, I've seen some sets, where I've been thinking that these aren't a quality of mcm and belong to example codes or hof/wof mainly. And often the sets I like are the most expensive ones (I can't afford to VP anymore, and I haven't supported it for YEARS)
But I feel like that at the moment, VP just throws random sets in mcm and hopes that people will buy them, but I don't think in general they (VP) think about the quality of the set. If the set isn't mcm quality, I don't think people would buy much of it, as VP wanted us to.
shortly: mcm quality (often) has been going down instead of up.
With all the sets VP is throwing into mcm, it should be cheaper.
Alright, if I sound mean, I'm sorry. I will try to sound as neutral as I can
The past few months, I've seen some sets, where I've been thinking that these aren't a quality of mcm and belong to example codes or hof/wof mainly. And often the sets I like are the most expensive ones (I can't afford to VP anymore, and I haven't supported it for YEARS)
But I feel like that at the moment, VP just throws random sets in mcm and hopes that people will buy them, but I don't think in general they (VP) think about the quality of the set. If the set isn't mcm quality, I don't think people would buy much of it, as VP wanted us to.
shortly: mcm quality (often) has been going down instead of up.
With all the sets VP is throwing into mcm, it should be cheaper.



0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.


20
