You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
selling wd! Pm me offers! In need of some cr 🌸
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
8 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

Music and Celebrities < Virtual Popstar First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
whats your favorite song in a...
Aske
Prince of Pop



ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
Aske wrote:
oh that's interesting,, btu sounds about right yes
basically norwegian dialects are grouped in østnorsk and vestnorsk, the first group is østlandsk and trøndersk and the other group is the remaining, northern norwegian and trøndersk clearly have traits in common as well, and to some degree you could argue that vestlandsk and østlandsk, at least in the border areas have some features in common.. trøndersk and sørlandsk do have some things in common although the general like prosody and all is extremely different.. but trøndersk and vestlandsk.... very few things. only lexical things like allegedly fot = hele benet + det som er fot i østlandsk 
Me saying heile beinet og foten but I think it just depends, I say tallerken instead of fat, spise instead of ete, but if u move one hour in location they r much more breisnakka (??)
when i talk abt bein i talk about actual skeleton pieces, fat instead of tallerken and ete instead of spise 
Private
International star



Aske wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
Aske wrote:
oh that's interesting,, btu sounds about right yes
basically norwegian dialects are grouped in østnorsk and vestnorsk, the first group is østlandsk and trøndersk and the other group is the remaining, northern norwegian and trøndersk clearly have traits in common as well, and to some degree you could argue that vestlandsk and østlandsk, at least in the border areas have some features in common.. trøndersk and sørlandsk do have some things in common although the general like prosody and all is extremely different.. but trøndersk and vestlandsk.... very few things. only lexical things like allegedly fot = hele benet + det som er fot i østlandsk 
oh i thought trøndersk had it's own category
it's wild to me that trøndersk is so different, even on the coast, the coastline dialects are generally very much more intelligable, to me at least lol, than when you move inlands but then trøndersk is like haha u thought
generally all dialects are first separated into two in norwegian and then further separated at lower levels. we have four major categories: vestlandsk, nordnorsk, østlandsk and trøndersk (sørlandsk is under vestlandsk, only separated on an even more detailed level) 
to be fair i don't understand all trøndersk dialects they're truly nightmarish in some places
Private
Popstar



Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
basically norwegian dialects are grouped in østnorsk and vestnorsk, the first group is østlandsk and trøndersk and the other group is the remaining, northern norwegian and trøndersk clearly have traits in common as well, and to some degree you could argue that vestlandsk and østlandsk, at least in the border areas have some features in common.. trøndersk and sørlandsk do have some things in common although the general like prosody and all is extremely different.. but trøndersk and vestlandsk.... very few things. only lexical things like allegedly fot = hele benet + det som er fot i østlandsk 
Me saying heile beinet og foten but I think it just depends, I say tallerken instead of fat, spise instead of ete, but if u move one hour in location they r much more breisnakka (??)
i say fot about the entire leg regardless and i say fat and not tallerken, i say spise, but i do have apocope so i say spis 
I don't know why I say tallerken and spise tbh, cus I didn't when I was younger but. Im at least easier to understand than ppl from like, sogndal or smth
Private
International star



Aske wrote:
ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
basically norwegian dialects are grouped in østnorsk and vestnorsk, the first group is østlandsk and trøndersk and the other group is the remaining, northern norwegian and trøndersk clearly have traits in common as well, and to some degree you could argue that vestlandsk and østlandsk, at least in the border areas have some features in common.. trøndersk and sørlandsk do have some things in common although the general like prosody and all is extremely different.. but trøndersk and vestlandsk.... very few things. only lexical things like allegedly fot = hele benet + det som er fot i østlandsk 
Me saying heile beinet og foten but I think it just depends, I say tallerken instead of fat, spise instead of ete, but if u move one hour in location they r much more breisnakka (??)
when i talk abt bein i talk about actual skeleton pieces, fat instead of tallerken and ete instead of spise 
yeah bein is skeleton for me as well, strictly that. using it for anything but the bones is just ?? horrible
Private
International star



ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
ouch wrote:
Me saying heile beinet og foten but I think it just depends, I say tallerken instead of fat, spise instead of ete, but if u move one hour in location they r much more breisnakka (??)
i say fot about the entire leg regardless and i say fat and not tallerken, i say spise, but i do have apocope so i say spis 
I don't know why I say tallerken and spise tbh, cus I didn't when I was younger but. Im at least easier to understand than ppl from like, sogndal or smth
tallerken is such a long word lmao fat is faster 
Private
Popstar



Aske wrote:
ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
basically norwegian dialects are grouped in østnorsk and vestnorsk, the first group is østlandsk and trøndersk and the other group is the remaining, northern norwegian and trøndersk clearly have traits in common as well, and to some degree you could argue that vestlandsk and østlandsk, at least in the border areas have some features in common.. trøndersk and sørlandsk do have some things in common although the general like prosody and all is extremely different.. but trøndersk and vestlandsk.... very few things. only lexical things like allegedly fot = hele benet + det som er fot i østlandsk 
Me saying heile beinet og foten but I think it just depends, I say tallerken instead of fat, spise instead of ete, but if u move one hour in location they r much more breisnakka (??)
when i talk abt bein i talk about actual skeleton pieces, fat instead of tallerken and ete instead of spise 
If I say bein I usually meanthe leg I think, I think if I were to talk abt the skeleton I would say uhhhh beinet i armen or smth
Private
Popstar



Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
i say fot about the entire leg regardless and i say fat and not tallerken, i say spise, but i do have apocope so i say spis 
I don't know why I say tallerken and spise tbh, cus I didn't when I was younger but. Im at least easier to understand than ppl from like, sogndal or smth
tallerken is such a long word lmao fat is faster 
It sounds better I think cus its more sharp sounding and I have to speak sharp otherwise nobody will understand 
Private
International star



ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
ouch wrote:
I don't know why I say tallerken and spise tbh, cus I didn't when I was younger but. Im at least easier to understand than ppl from like, sogndal or smth
tallerken is such a long word lmao fat is faster 
It sounds better I think cus its more sharp sounding and I have to speak sharp otherwise nobody will understand 
interesting
Aske
Prince of Pop



Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
Aske wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
basically norwegian dialects are grouped in østnorsk and vestnorsk, the first group is østlandsk and trøndersk and the other group is the remaining, northern norwegian and trøndersk clearly have traits in common as well, and to some degree you could argue that vestlandsk and østlandsk, at least in the border areas have some features in common.. trøndersk and sørlandsk do have some things in common although the general like prosody and all is extremely different.. but trøndersk and vestlandsk.... very few things. only lexical things like allegedly fot = hele benet + det som er fot i østlandsk 
oh i thought trøndersk had it's own category
it's wild to me that trøndersk is so different, even on the coast, the coastline dialects are generally very much more intelligable, to me at least lol, than when you move inlands but then trøndersk is like haha u thought
generally all dialects are first separated into two in norwegian and then further separated at lower levels. we have four major categories: vestlandsk, nordnorsk, østlandsk and trøndersk (sørlandsk is under vestlandsk, only separated on an even more detailed level) 
to be fair i don't understand all trøndersk dialects they're truly nightmarish in some places
hmm questionable but im no linguist so i won't protest
i guess it makes sense on some level, aren't the eastern dialects and possibly trøndersk considered semi austnordisk
Aske
Prince of Pop



ouch wrote:
Aske wrote:
ouch wrote:
Me saying heile beinet og foten but I think it just depends, I say tallerken instead of fat, spise instead of ete, but if u move one hour in location they r much more breisnakka (??)
when i talk abt bein i talk about actual skeleton pieces, fat instead of tallerken and ete instead of spise 
If I say bein I usually meanthe leg I think, I think if I were to talk abt the skeleton I would say uhhhh beinet i armen or smth
i'd just specify where on the foot, like im not gonna call the lår a foot but not a bein either u kno
Private
International star



Aske wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
Aske wrote:
oh i thought trøndersk had it's own category
it's wild to me that trøndersk is so different, even on the coast, the coastline dialects are generally very much more intelligable, to me at least lol, than when you move inlands but then trøndersk is like haha u thought
generally all dialects are first separated into two in norwegian and then further separated at lower levels. we have four major categories: vestlandsk, nordnorsk, østlandsk and trøndersk (sørlandsk is under vestlandsk, only separated on an even more detailed level) 
to be fair i don't understand all trøndersk dialects they're truly nightmarish in some places
hmm questionable but im no linguist so i won't protest
i guess it makes sense on some level, aren't the eastern dialects and possibly trøndersk considered semi austnordisk
it does make sense when you really go into the details but i don't think anyone is super interested in the details surrounding it 
in what sense? 
Private
Popstar



Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
ouch wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
tallerken is such a long word lmao fat is faster 
It sounds better I think cus its more sharp sounding and I have to speak sharp otherwise nobody will understand 
interesting
Cus im mumbly and sharp sounds easier penetrate theough the mumble allegedly
Aske
Prince of Pop



Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
Aske wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
generally all dialects are first separated into two in norwegian and then further separated at lower levels. we have four major categories: vestlandsk, nordnorsk, østlandsk and trøndersk (sørlandsk is under vestlandsk, only separated on an even more detailed level) 
to be fair i don't understand all trøndersk dialects they're truly nightmarish in some places
hmm questionable but im no linguist so i won't protest
i guess it makes sense on some level, aren't the eastern dialects and possibly trøndersk considered semi austnordisk
it does make sense when you really go into the details but i don't think anyone is super interested in the details surrounding it 
in what sense? 
i think it's very interesting i just temporarely shut my brain to linguistics after exfac språkkunnskap cuz pain
uh idk i can't back it up i just feel like i've read that somewhere, moving in that direction at least
Aske
Prince of Pop



Aske wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
Aske wrote:
hmm questionable but im no linguist so i won't protest
i guess it makes sense on some level, aren't the eastern dialects and possibly trøndersk considered semi austnordisk
it does make sense when you really go into the details but i don't think anyone is super interested in the details surrounding it 
in what sense? 
i think it's very interesting i just temporarely shut my brain to linguistics after exfac språkkunnskap cuz pain
uh idk i can't back it up i just feel like i've read that somewhere, moving in that direction at least
i mean austlandsk as in oslo and friends is basically bokmål and bokmål i austnordisk at least
Private
International star



Aske wrote:
Fibraecataphyllolotlum wrote:
Aske wrote:
hmm questionable but im no linguist so i won't protest
i guess it makes sense on some level, aren't the eastern dialects and possibly trøndersk considered semi austnordisk
it does make sense when you really go into the details but i don't think anyone is super interested in the details surrounding it 
in what sense? 
i think it's very interesting i just temporarely shut my brain to linguistics after exfac språkkunnskap cuz pain
uh idk i can't back it up i just feel like i've read that somewhere, moving in that direction at least
exfac .. oof 
i don't really see how because languages can't really jump from one category to another regardless of how much contact there is, but the østnorske dialects are generally more similar to the eastern scandinavian languages and dialects than what is the case for vestnorske dialects, you have like dialect continuums in those areas which are interesting like the apocope one which even reach the swedish spoken on the westcoast of finland 
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last