You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Helmi
Why are mp prices so crazy.. YES I’m looking at you 🫵
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
15 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
i severely underestimated
Private
Minister of Pop



plss im not even halfway through
MasileinDE
International star



I believe in you!
Private
Minister of Pop



MasileinDE wrote:
I believe in you!
thanks bro that's at least 1 person
Private
Popstar



I guess some ppl see ppl getting accepted for jobs/school because of their gender as good discrimination (men in womens fields and women in mens fields uknow the deal) but I do not agree 
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
I guess some ppl see ppl getting accepted for jobs/school because of their gender as good discrimination (men in womens fields and women in mens fields uknow the deal) but I do not agree 
Forced equality I mean, not a good thing
Private
Minister of Pop



ouch wrote:
ouch wrote:
I guess some ppl see ppl getting accepted for jobs/school because of their gender as good discrimination (men in womens fields and women in mens fields uknow the deal) but I do not agree 
Forced equality I mean, not a good thing
why is that
Private
Minister of Pop



im halfway ???????????????????????????????? fuc ky ea
Private
Popstar



Azriel wrote:
ouch wrote:
ouch wrote:
I guess some ppl see ppl getting accepted for jobs/school because of their gender as good discrimination (men in womens fields and women in mens fields uknow the deal) but I do not agree 
Forced equality I mean, not a good thing
why is that
Cus its forced and not based on skill level or the interest of the interest of the different genders. Its great to not discriminate against gender obv, like employing women in higher status jobs (I forgot the word but uknow what I mean), but it shouldn't be forced. It goes kind of into the stereotypical gender roles, like women want to work with people (healthcare etc) while men might want more physical labour or are more motivated by money, not every man and woman is like that obviously, but I don't think the gap would be this big if it wasn't for men and women having different interests, so there is really no point in forcing it imo. But as I said, its great to (and people should) look past gender obv in hiring etc, but forced equality sometimes becomes like "we need to have a 50/50 divide between men and women as nurses, bosses etc" when it might not be what people want. And as I said w skill level yeah, I want people to hire the most qualified person, not look past that and hire based on gender. Its kind of hard to get the balance right tho because of how stuff is today but u get my point hopefully
Private
Minister of Pop



ouch wrote:
Azriel wrote:
ouch wrote:
Forced equality I mean, not a good thing
why is that
Cus its forced and not based on skill level or the interest of the interest of the different genders. Its great to not discriminate against gender obv, like employing women in higher status jobs (I forgot the word but uknow what I mean), but it shouldn't be forced. It goes kind of into the stereotypical gender roles, like women want to work with people (healthcare etc) while men might want more physical labour or are more motivated by money, not every man and woman is like that obviously, but I don't think the gap would be this big if it wasn't for men and women having different interests, so there is really no point in forcing it imo. But as I said, its great to (and people should) look past gender obv in hiring etc, but forced equality sometimes becomes like "we need to have a 50/50 divide between men and women as nurses, bosses etc" when it might not be what people want. And as I said w skill level yeah, I want people to hire the most qualified person, not look past that and hire based on gender. Its kind of hard to get the balance right tho because of how stuff is today but u get my point hopefully
I do get ur point yes and I agree that people should hire the most qualified person etc, but sexism is somehow still a thing apparently and without a quota it doesnt rly happen ? so this might be the best solution there is atm
Private
Popstar



Azriel wrote:
ouch wrote:
Azriel wrote:
why is that
Cus its forced and not based on skill level or the interest of the interest of the different genders. Its great to not discriminate against gender obv, like employing women in higher status jobs (I forgot the word but uknow what I mean), but it shouldn't be forced. It goes kind of into the stereotypical gender roles, like women want to work with people (healthcare etc) while men might want more physical labour or are more motivated by money, not every man and woman is like that obviously, but I don't think the gap would be this big if it wasn't for men and women having different interests, so there is really no point in forcing it imo. But as I said, its great to (and people should) look past gender obv in hiring etc, but forced equality sometimes becomes like "we need to have a 50/50 divide between men and women as nurses, bosses etc" when it might not be what people want. And as I said w skill level yeah, I want people to hire the most qualified person, not look past that and hire based on gender. Its kind of hard to get the balance right tho because of how stuff is today but u get my point hopefully
I do get ur point yes and I agree that people should hire the most qualified person etc, but sexism is somehow still a thing apparently and without a quota it doesnt rly happen ? so this might be the best solution there is atm
Yeah I agree, thats why its kind of hard. I don't think discrimination is as big in the healthcare sector etc (honestly I don't know but I imagine) as it is in higher paying jobs tho. And with very hard physical labour ofc I imagine women getting more turned away but I think that can be blamed on physical strength a lot. But yeah hmm 
Random
Popstar



Azriel wrote:
I have .. 9 hours
I was able to write 4000 words in 3 days. You can do this.
Private
Minister of Pop



ouch wrote:
Azriel wrote:
ouch wrote:
Cus its forced and not based on skill level or the interest of the interest of the different genders. Its great to not discriminate against gender obv, like employing women in higher status jobs (I forgot the word but uknow what I mean), but it shouldn't be forced. It goes kind of into the stereotypical gender roles, like women want to work with people (healthcare etc) while men might want more physical labour or are more motivated by money, not every man and woman is like that obviously, but I don't think the gap would be this big if it wasn't for men and women having different interests, so there is really no point in forcing it imo. But as I said, its great to (and people should) look past gender obv in hiring etc, but forced equality sometimes becomes like "we need to have a 50/50 divide between men and women as nurses, bosses etc" when it might not be what people want. And as I said w skill level yeah, I want people to hire the most qualified person, not look past that and hire based on gender. Its kind of hard to get the balance right tho because of how stuff is today but u get my point hopefully
I do get ur point yes and I agree that people should hire the most qualified person etc, but sexism is somehow still a thing apparently and without a quota it doesnt rly happen ? so this might be the best solution there is atm
Yeah I agree, thats why its kind of hard. I don't think discrimination is as big in the healthcare sector etc (honestly I don't know but I imagine) as it is in higher paying jobs tho. And with very hard physical labour ofc I imagine women getting more turned away but I think that can be blamed on physical strength a lot. But yeah hmm 
ahh yeah true
im mainly focusing on positions of power tho like CEOs etc
Private
Minister of Pop



Random wrote:
Azriel wrote:
I have .. 9 hours
I was able to write 4000 words in 3 days. You can do this.
thank u random i appreciate ur faith in me
honestly like I have to finish it tonight so I probably will its just aaaaaaa
Random
Popstar



Azriel wrote:
Random wrote:
Azriel wrote:
I have .. 9 hours
I was able to write 4000 words in 3 days. You can do this.
thank u random i appreciate ur faith in me
honestly like I have to finish it tonight so I probably will its just aaaaaaa
I believe in you!
One step at a time and before you notice, done.
Private
Minister of Pop



Random wrote:
Azriel wrote:
Random wrote:
I was able to write 4000 words in 3 days. You can do this.
thank u random i appreciate ur faith in me
honestly like I have to finish it tonight so I probably will its just aaaaaaa
I believe in you!
One step at a time and before you notice, done.
I know its an expression im just taking it too literally but i will def notice how far i am at every word i write huhu
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last