You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
13 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
kyle rittenhouse
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
@Libertas @YSL  @CheerGirl 
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:20
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
@CheerGirl@YSL @Libertas @Savage @legohouse @luminescence @octocat @Hennastii 
great minds think alike xx
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:21
Bimbo
Popstar



Bimbo wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
he was trying to get away from his attackers but when they got him cornered he had to use his gun. who attacked who first again?

Why tf was he there? Why tf did he have a gun? A 17 year old with a riffle? I can't believe there's people like you actually defending him!!
he was protecting property from being destroyed. but even if he went there for no reason other than just going on a walk.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
19
Posts: 19216
Date: 28-08-2020 22:21
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:

Why tf was he there? Why tf did he have a gun? A 17 year old with a riffle? I can't believe there's people like you actually defending him!!
he was protecting property from being destroyed. but even if he went there for no reason other than just going on a walk.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
especially in a place they don't live in
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:22
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:

Why tf was he there? Why tf did he have a gun? A 17 year old with a riffle? I can't believe there's people like you actually defending him!!
he was protecting property from being destroyed. but even if he went there for no reason other than just going on a walk.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
whatever his reason was.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:22
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
he was protecting property from being destroyed. but even if he went there for no reason other than just going on a walk.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
whatever his reason was.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.
ever thought maybe they were trying to take the gun from him???
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:23
Bimbo
Popstar



Bimbo wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
he was protecting property from being destroyed. but even if he went there for no reason other than just going on a walk.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
whatever his reason was.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

If I see someone with a fucking gun I'm going to feel threatened, and the way to eliminate the threat is to take his gun away from him
19
Posts: 19216
Date: 28-08-2020 22:23
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
whatever his reason was.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

If I see someone with a fucking gun I'm going to feel threatened, and the way to eliminate the threat is to take his gun away from him
that's what i was trying to get at xx
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:23
Private
International Star



Caramelia wrote:
I'm gonna laugh so hard if this thread gets deleted
There's literally nothing wrong with it. 
20
Posts: 7042
Date: 28-08-2020 22:25
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
whatever his reason was.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.
ever thought maybe they were trying to take the gun from him???
you CANNOT do that.. all kinds of bad things can happen. and how do you know the people who were "trying to get his gun" would've stopped there and not used it to harm even more people? 

rittenhouse wouldn't have shot them if they didn't attack him first. this is clearly evident when he refuses to shoot the guy who backs away even after chasing him.
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:25
Bimbo
Popstar



Bimbo wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
whatever his reason was.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.
ever thought maybe they were trying to take the gun from him???
you CANNOT do that.. all kinds of bad things can happen. and how do you know the people who were "trying to get his gun" would've stopped there and not used it to harm even more people? 

rittenhouse wouldn't have shot them if they didn't attack him first. this is clearly evident when he refuses to shoot the guy who backs away even after chasing him.

He also wouldn't have shot them if he HADN'T HAD A FUCKING GUN WITH HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!!
19
Posts: 19216
Date: 28-08-2020 22:27
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
@luminescence @Libertas  @YSL 
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:27
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
ever thought maybe they were trying to take the gun from him???
you CANNOT do that.. all kinds of bad things can happen. and how do you know the people who were "trying to get his gun" would've stopped there and not used it to harm even more people? 

rittenhouse wouldn't have shot them if they didn't attack him first. this is clearly evident when he refuses to shoot the guy who backs away even after chasing him.

He also wouldn't have shot them if he HADN'T HAD A FUCKING GUN WITH HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!!
he defended himself. he was being attacked.
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:27
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
you CANNOT do that.. all kinds of bad things can happen. and how do you know the people who were "trying to get his gun" would've stopped there and not used it to harm even more people? 

rittenhouse wouldn't have shot them if they didn't attack him first. this is clearly evident when he refuses to shoot the guy who backs away even after chasing him.

He also wouldn't have shot them if he HADN'T HAD A FUCKING GUN WITH HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!!
he defended himself. he was being attacked.
The law in wisconson: The state also generally prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18

I'm not even im america and i know that
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:28
Bimbo
Popstar



Bimbo wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
you CANNOT do that.. all kinds of bad things can happen. and how do you know the people who were "trying to get his gun" would've stopped there and not used it to harm even more people? 

rittenhouse wouldn't have shot them if they didn't attack him first. this is clearly evident when he refuses to shoot the guy who backs away even after chasing him.

He also wouldn't have shot them if he HADN'T HAD A FUCKING GUN WITH HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!!
he defended himself. he was being attacked.

He wasn't being attacked, people were trying to take a lethal weapon away from someone who was clearly planning on hurting them, and because you're obviously too stupid to understand that, I'm leaving this damn thread
19
Posts: 19216
Date: 28-08-2020 22:29
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use