Sweethoney wrote:
Rouya wrote:
i KNOW this you dont need to talk to me like im 6 years old. I would rather have a source directly then having to look for it myself. The person who makes the argument should give sources directly and thats my opinion.
Rouya wrote:
this is from the white slavery page. i hovered over the footnote, and you know what it links to? a stanford article. which is what? an actual source.
what im saying is, that the wiki page is not a source in itself, it however links all its claim to actual sources which you can easily look up, because they are added as footnotes to the paper. so reading a wikipedia article is like reading a well-sourced paper. the paper is not a source, but you can reference to the paper, as it is properly sourced and thereby reliable information.Sweethoney wrote:
Ya thats why i said "white slavey wiki page" isnt a source xd
no but you know what is? right here:Ya thats why i said "white slavey wiki page" isnt a source xd
this is from the white slavery page. i hovered over the footnote, and you know what it links to? a stanford article. which is what? an actual source.



0
0
0
0
To join the forums you need to be logged in.


7