You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
13 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
kyle rittenhouse
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:

Nobody goes for a walk witha fucking riffle
whatever his reason was.... what gives people the right to attack him? do you think the mob were in the right to attack an armed man like that? you are only putting blame on him for carrying but you haven't said anything about his attackers.

If I see someone with a fucking gun I'm going to feel threatened, and the way to eliminate the threat is to take his gun away from him
"eliminate the threat" he was running away from them! it's not like he cornered them and they could only try to take his gun away from him..... did you even watch the video?
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:29
Private
World Famous



luminescence wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
@luminescence @Libertas  @YSL 
Hold on I’m gonna read everything now
21
Posts: 24182
Date: 28-08-2020 22:30
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
luminescence wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
@luminescence @Libertas  @YSL 
Hold on I’m gonna read everything now
No bother because it says somethign when two of us tag mods xx
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:30
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
luminescence wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
@luminescence @Libertas  @YSL 
Hold on I’m gonna read everything now
please do. there is nothing wrong with this thread
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:31
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:

He also wouldn't have shot them if he HADN'T HAD A FUCKING GUN WITH HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!!
he defended himself. he was being attacked.

He wasn't being attacked, people were trying to take a lethal weapon away from someone who was clearly planning on hurting them, and because you're obviously too stupid to understand that, I'm leaving this damn thread
they were chasing an armed man.. i repeat... they were chasing an armed man while screaming "get him!"......
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:32 | Times changed: 1
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
he defended himself. he was being attacked.

He wasn't being attacked, people were trying to take a lethal weapon away from someone who was clearly planning on hurting them, and because you're obviously too stupid to understand that, I'm leaving this damn thread
they were chasing an armed man.. i repeat... they were chasing an armed man while screaming "get him!"......
Again, in wisconson: prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:38
Private
World Famous



Rotte wrote:
It was dumb of him to bring a riffle, i think he deserves jail even if he was mobbed, that don't give the right to shot people imo.

and it's dumb of them to approach a armed man i guess? if i saw an armed person i would for sure run away and not against them. For legal reasons he wouldn't be able to claim self defense if they had run away either.
21
Posts: 70329
Date: 28-08-2020 22:38 | Times changed: 1
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
VanityVogue wrote:

He wasn't being attacked, people were trying to take a lethal weapon away from someone who was clearly planning on hurting them, and because you're obviously too stupid to understand that, I'm leaving this damn thread
they were chasing an armed man.. i repeat... they were chasing an armed man while screaming "get him!"......
Again, in wisconson: prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18
what does that have to do with the people who attacked him? they wouldn't have known whether he was carrying legally or not
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:39
Private
International Star



Caramelia wrote:
Okay, so I've read and watched some more vids n forums. The video where he explains why he is there he genuinely seems to want to protect people and the shops. The fact that a 17-year-old can get his hands on a gun though is outrageous. But I don't think he tried to kill people on purpose. It was really just a shitty situation that only happened because guns are allowed. 

Another thing that I noticed though, was that the police was chill about it? Like wtf?
20
Posts: 7042
Date: 28-08-2020 22:40
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
they were chasing an armed man.. i repeat... they were chasing an armed man while screaming "get him!"......
Again, in wisconson: prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18
what does that have to do with the people who attacked him? they wouldn't have known whether he was carrying legally or not
he's is in trouble with the law anyway for having possession of a firearm
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:40
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
Fayy wrote:
Okay, so I've read and watched some more vids n forums. The video where he explains why he is there he genuinely seems to want to protect people and the shops. The fact that a 17-year-old can get his hands on a gun though is outrageous. But I don't think he tried to kill people on purpose. It was really just a shitty situation that only happened because guns are allowed. 

Another thing that I noticed though, was that the police was chill about it? Like wtf?
yes i agree
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:42
Slave2Master
Streetmusician



Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Again, in wisconson: prohibits the possession of a firearm by any person under age 18
what does that have to do with the people who attacked him? they wouldn't have known whether he was carrying legally or not
he's is in trouble with the law anyway for having possession of a firearm
what about the people who attacked him? you don't think they did anything wrong?
7
Posts: 784
Date: 28-08-2020 22:42
Private
Youtube Star



devilcake wrote:
why did a seventeen y/o have access to a gun like that wtf
19
Posts: 194253
Date: 28-08-2020 22:42
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
devilcake wrote:
why did a seventeen y/o have access to a gun like that wtf
thank you someone else who wants to know that as well xx
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:44
Private
World Famous



AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
AtlantaG1912 wrote:
Slave2Master wrote:
what does that have to do with the people who attacked him? they wouldn't have known whether he was carrying legally or not
he's is in trouble with the law anyway for having possession of a firearm
what about the people who attacked him? you don't think they did anything wrong?
No they did do something wrong by looting but at the end of day he was in possession of a firearm which was illegal in the first place then he made it worse by shooting them making him the one in the wrong not them
20
Posts: 23933
Date: 28-08-2020 22:45 | Times changed: 1
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use