You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
22 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
So
BunnyButts
International Star



ouch wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
umm are we really having a converstation about if 14 year olds are developed ???

the answer is no 
they cant consent 
theyre children
We are aware m8
then stop making it sound like youre defending it
Kalypso
International Star



ouch wrote:
kalypso wrote:
ouch wrote:
Not in terms of being a pedo, depending if she was in puberty or not
okay that's when im gonna say no, that's for sure pedophilic behavior, idc, bc 1 u can actually still not have hit puberty or u r still in puberty 2 u brain is a child when u r 14 for sure
Yes thats why I say depending if they have gotten in puberty or not, if not, pedo, if they have (for more than like, 2 weeks lol, u get) not a pedo but still bad 
no im saying i dont think u should depend it on if the individual had hit it or not. idc if the person at age of 14 is like fully developed or not, it's still pedofilia in my eyes 
Private
Popstar



bones wrote:
arguing about pedophilia v ephebophilia (no one knows how to even write that tf) just takes away from the fact that both are wrong and the victim is still a child
it doesnt matter that one is worse, both are bad, that's it
Ofc both r wrong lol, but call it what it is at least lol
Private
World Famous



lets just stop using -phile n call are creeps attracted to underage people child predators
Account deleted




bones wrote:
arguing about pedophilia v ephebophilia (no one knows how to even write that tf) just takes away from the fact that both are wrong and the victim is still a child
it doesnt matter that one is worse, both are bad, that's it

yes both are bad, but mixing up the terms doesn't help anyone either, like it was the old debate about the term, no one questioned that it was/is a horrible thing to date a 14 year old when you are like late 20s or whatever he was.
BunnyButts
International Star



ouch wrote:
bones wrote:
arguing about pedophilia v ephebophilia (no one knows how to even write that tf) just takes away from the fact that both are wrong and the victim is still a child
it doesnt matter that one is worse, both are bad, that's it
Ofc both r wrong lol, but call it what it is at least lol
pedophilia is a blanket term 
Kalypso
International Star



kalypso wrote:
ouch wrote:
kalypso wrote:
okay that's when im gonna say no, that's for sure pedophilic behavior, idc, bc 1 u can actually still not have hit puberty or u r still in puberty 2 u brain is a child when u r 14 for sure
Yes thats why I say depending if they have gotten in puberty or not, if not, pedo, if they have (for more than like, 2 weeks lol, u get) not a pedo but still bad 
no im saying i dont think u should depend it on if the individual had hit it or not. idc if the person at age of 14 is like fully developed or not, it's still pedofilia in my eyes 
the definition is just made so you can compare it to something and put it in context, it's not to be taken literal like i think u r 
Kalypso
International Star



bones wrote:
lets just stop using -phile n call are creeps attracted to underage people child predators
yes 
Kalypso
International Star



kalypso wrote:
bones wrote:
lets just stop using -phile n call are creeps attracted to underage people child predators
yes 
he's a child predator
discussion solved 
Private
Popstar



kalypso wrote:
kalypso wrote:
ouch wrote:
Yes thats why I say depending if they have gotten in puberty or not, if not, pedo, if they have (for more than like, 2 weeks lol, u get) not a pedo but still bad 
no im saying i dont think u should depend it on if the individual had hit it or not. idc if the person at age of 14 is like fully developed or not, it's still pedofilia in my eyes 
the definition is just made so you can compare it to something and put it in context, it's not to be taken literal like i think u r 
It is literal, if you are attracted to bodies that have not gotten in puberty, u r a pedophile, if they have, u r not a pedophile. Easy as that honestly lol
Kalypso
International Star



ouch wrote:
kalypso wrote:
kalypso wrote:
no im saying i dont think u should depend it on if the individual had hit it or not. idc if the person at age of 14 is like fully developed or not, it's still pedofilia in my eyes 
the definition is just made so you can compare it to something and put it in context, it's not to be taken literal like i think u r 
It is literal, if you are attracted to bodies that have not gotten in puberty, u r a pedophile, if they have, u r not a pedophile. Easy as that honestly lol
i said discussion solved 
Private
Popstar



BunnyButts wrote:
ouch wrote:
bones wrote:
arguing about pedophilia v ephebophilia (no one knows how to even write that tf) just takes away from the fact that both are wrong and the victim is still a child
it doesnt matter that one is worse, both are bad, that's it
Ofc both r wrong lol, but call it what it is at least lol
pedophilia is a blanket term 
From what I can find, pedophilia isn't a blanket term, but csa/child predator etc etc are, cus it includes pedophilia + all others 
Private
Streetmusician



chris hansen
Private
International Star



kruspersille wrote:
chris hansen
He to busy with the goon squad 
Private
Minister of Pop



The dutch server has been in complete c h a o s over this today, something with obsidian
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last