You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 ྀིྀིྀིྀིྀིYeah, Ive changed my name again ྀིྀིྀིྀིྀི
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
16 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
ah yes
Private
World Famous



Hazee1 wrote:
20
Posts: 3894
Date: 22-12-2020 01:52
Private
World Famous



Claire wrote:
BloomCissi wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
'The government should provide a guaranteed minimum income to its citizens free of charge.'

tbh i struggled w this q cuz like if i answered 'strongly disagree' or whatever it probably would have told me thats 'less socialist' but i think i actually dont rly agree with the idea of universal basic income but i also dont think that makes me less socialist lol . WHAT R UR THOUGHTS ON IT
I'm not sure what the term actually entails, but if it's like, that the government should provide everyone with enough money to cover basic needs (or for example provide housing free of charge or however you want to arrange it), then I don't see how that would be a bad thing.
ngl i thought the cconcept was a rediculous propasal when Yang suggested it in his bid for the presidency but the pandemic has convinced me that we need a UBI.
21
Posts: 55741
Date: 22-12-2020 01:55
Private
World Famous



Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
I'm not surprised. How can anyone be so fucked in their head that they genuinely think that they can claim land as their own, it's not beneficial for humanity as a whole, it's highly individualistic and I would rather be shot than follow an individualistic approach to life. Egoism is disgusting. How can someone sit on land that could feed thousands of people, and house even more, while these people starve? I'm sorry but what's wrong with you if you're able to justify being rich while people starve? While people die from things that could be treated? When millions and millions of people live on the street, people freezing to death because they are unable to get shelter? 
Well damn I thought that property meant a house? Like owning a house? Honestly never mind, I was just trying to learn something but I'd rather not have things such as "fucked in their head" and "what is wrong with you" thrown at me. 
It's not a you aimed at you as second person singular. It's a general you. A neutral, hypothetical you. If you take it personal.. well? 
I don't think people should own houses, you are free to tell me why you think it's justifiable. 
i'm pretty sure that 90% of the time that people get offended on vp it's because they didnt understand the way the english language was being used.
21
Posts: 55741
Date: 22-12-2020 01:57
Capitaine
Youtube Star



Capitaine wrote:
Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
Well damn I thought that property meant a house? Like owning a house? Honestly never mind, I was just trying to learn something but I'd rather not have things such as "fucked in their head" and "what is wrong with you" thrown at me. 
It's not a you aimed at you as second person singular. It's a general you. A neutral, hypothetical you. If you take it personal.. well? 
I don't think people should own houses, you are free to tell me why you think it's justifiable. 
i'm pretty sure that 90% of the time that people get offended on vp it's because they didnt understand the way the english language was being used.
I think this is what happened and I'm sorry if I came off angry. 
11
Posts: 5637
Date: 22-12-2020 02:24
Private
National Star



Imani wrote:
Claire wrote:
BloomCissi wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
'The government should provide a guaranteed minimum income to its citizens free of charge.'

tbh i struggled w this q cuz like if i answered 'strongly disagree' or whatever it probably would have told me thats 'less socialist' but i think i actually dont rly agree with the idea of universal basic income but i also dont think that makes me less socialist lol . WHAT R UR THOUGHTS ON IT
I'm not sure what the term actually entails, but if it's like, that the government should provide everyone with enough money to cover basic needs (or for example provide housing free of charge or however you want to arrange it), then I don't see how that would be a bad thing.
ngl i thought the cconcept was a rediculous propasal when Yang suggested it in his bid for the presidency but the pandemic has convinced me that we need a UBI.
same tbh 
15
Posts: 2268
Date: 22-12-2020 02:27
Private
International Star



wug wrote:
Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Capitaine wrote:
Well damn I thought that property meant a house? Like owning a house? Honestly never mind, I was just trying to learn something but I'd rather not have things such as "fucked in their head" and "what is wrong with you" thrown at me. 
It's not a you aimed at you as second person singular. It's a general you. A neutral, hypothetical you. If you take it personal.. well? 
I don't think people should own houses, you are free to tell me why you think it's justifiable. 
i'm pretty sure that 90% of the time that people get offended on vp it's because they didnt understand the way the english language was being used.
One of the biggest issues with English is the lack of distinction between plural and singular you. 
Meanwhile we have languages that are like we do dualis, trialis, etc. and exclusive and inclusive. 
19
Posts: 108104
Date: 22-12-2020 02:27
Private
World Famous



Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
It's not a you aimed at you as second person singular. It's a general you. A neutral, hypothetical you. If you take it personal.. well? 
I don't think people should own houses, you are free to tell me why you think it's justifiable. 
i'm pretty sure that 90% of the time that people get offended on vp it's because they didnt understand the way the english language was being used.
One of the biggest issues with English is the lack of distinction between plural and singular you. 
Meanwhile we have languages that are like we do dualis, trialis, etc. and exclusive and inclusive. 
i'm still in favor of dropping the subject entirely
21
Posts: 55741
Date: 22-12-2020 02:28
Private
International Star



wug wrote:
Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Claire wrote:
i'm pretty sure that 90% of the time that people get offended on vp it's because they didnt understand the way the english language was being used.
One of the biggest issues with English is the lack of distinction between plural and singular you. 
Meanwhile we have languages that are like we do dualis, trialis, etc. and exclusive and inclusive. 
i'm still in favor of dropping the subject entirely
it wouldn't work at all in norwegian because the subject is often the only indicator of the entire sentence on who it is about or whatever as we do not conjugate verbs after person or number, not for a single verb, and adjectives are only modified based on gender (either of the animate thing or the gender class the word belongs to) and number (singular/plural) so yeah.. it doesn't work. 
19
Posts: 108104
Date: 22-12-2020 02:30
Elowyn
World Famous



Elowyn wrote:
20
Posts: 16634
Date: 22-12-2020 02:31
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
I do love in french have a singular and plural you
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 22-12-2020 02:31
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
also looking at everyone elses I realize now its not a collective norm lol I thought everyone would be on the far end of socialism
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 22-12-2020 02:32
Private
International Star



wug wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
I do love in french have a singular and plural you
norwegian has du/dere (or dåkker/dykker etc. instead of dere) 
19
Posts: 108104
Date: 22-12-2020 02:33
Private
Streetmusician



kruspersille wrote:
wait why not own house
what to do instead
live for free or rent
14
Posts: 59902
Date: 22-12-2020 02:33
Private
International Star



wug wrote:
kruspersille wrote:
wait why not own house
what to do instead
live for free or rent
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"
You'll get what you need. If you are a family of a couple and three kids, you likely need a 4 bedroom house/apartment. It is better if a family of 5 get those that some rich asshole who will rent it to them for way more than what is actually sensible just because of tilbud og etterspørsel 
19
Posts: 108104
Date: 22-12-2020 02:35
Private
World Famous



Claire wrote:
kruspersille wrote:
wait why not own house
what to do instead
live for free or rent
you know that bit in a wrinkle in time where everyone has the same house and the same kids are out front bouncing the same balls all in time

thats unironically the future that snus wants
21
Posts: 55741
Date: 22-12-2020 02:36
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use