You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
16 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
ACTUAL controversial opinions
Private
National Star



kagura wrote:
Koolaid wrote:
kagura wrote:
how 4 is controversial opinion tho isn't that just a fact, like of course getting more excrise and eating healthier is for health too but.. of course those challenges are sold by aesthetic? who even denials that like idk at least the ones i've seen like iv'e been like "get abs in 2 weeks" like of course that's for aesthetic 
obviously. challenges like that sells because it has something concrete to pursue? "getting healthier in two weeks" is just absurd, there's no visible result to sell why would anyone want to buy that 
i feel like the very diet culture / fitness culture around these weight loss challenges does try to sell it's 'just for health' 'all for yourself' when in fact it isn't. (fitness culture in general is just very disingenuous)
well i have to disagree with that, because all i've been is that they indeed sell them for looks  
but agreed with fitness culture being disingenuous 

diet culture in general. it's fucking unbelievable. i mean i've always been underweight and yet at some point of my life i've been thinking i need to lose weight, because that's just how society works. it's so sick 
14
Posts: 7616
Date: 01-01-2022 11:43
Account deleted




wrote:
yeah
nice
porn is legit just rape on film
Date: 01-01-2022 12:24
Private
National Star



Sylvan wrote:
12 is just weird and mean tbh.

16
Posts: 17933
Date: 01-01-2022 12:44
Axon
Karaoke Star



Axon wrote:
oh this is definitely interesting
3
Posts: 22
Date: 01-01-2022 12:48
Private
Youtube Star



Hatchling wrote:
Plastic surgery for anything but reconstruction or life-threatening reasons is bad and often addictive. It also almost always just reaffirms the eurocentric beauty standards. It also seems like in today's society the body is seen as a fashion accessory instead of an actual human body and is regularly treated as such, doing life-threatening surgeries for the vainest stupid things. (Like a BLL's which I honestly think shouldn't even be allowed) It is also often done for the male gaze and honestly, no one has been able to convince me otherwise... 
10
Posts: 218
Date: 01-01-2022 12:54
Private
National Star



Sylvan wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
12 is just weird and mean tbh.
Like asexuality is even on the kinsey scale, asexuals are not straight.

queer people = not straight and or not cis

asexuals =/ straight, because straight = heterosexual

If you want to go by the 'oppressed sexual and gender minorities' definition:

It's not a competition, but asexuals suffer from stigma and prejudice too.

Asexuality is incredibly pathologized and not taken seriously, especially in men. 
There are people more equipped to explain this, but asexual youths go through many of the same cycles as other lgbt+ youth and experience rejection and shame because of who they are.
16
Posts: 17933
Date: 01-01-2022 13:01
Private
National Star



Sylvan wrote:
kinda scared for your opinion on nb people lol
16
Posts: 17933
Date: 01-01-2022 13:02
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
12 is just weird and mean tbh.
Like asexuality is even on the kinsey scale, asexuals are not straight.

queer people = not straight and or not cis

asexuals =/ straight, because straight = heterosexual

If you want to go by the 'oppressed sexual and gender minorities' definition:

It's not a competition, but asexuals suffer from stigma and prejudice too.

Asexuality is incredibly pathologized and not taken seriously, especially in men. 
There are people more equipped to explain this, but asexual youths go through many of the same cycles as other lgbt+ youth and experience rejection and shame because of who they are.
U can be asexual and straight tho, its usually just an undercategory of straight/gay/bi I guess 
16
Posts: 95664
Date: 01-01-2022 13:04
Private
National Star



Sylvan wrote:
ouch wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
12 is just weird and mean tbh.
Like asexuality is even on the kinsey scale, asexuals are not straight.

queer people = not straight and or not cis

asexuals =/ straight, because straight = heterosexual

If you want to go by the 'oppressed sexual and gender minorities' definition:

It's not a competition, but asexuals suffer from stigma and prejudice too.

Asexuality is incredibly pathologized and not taken seriously, especially in men. 
There are people more equipped to explain this, but asexual youths go through many of the same cycles as other lgbt+ youth and experience rejection and shame because of who they are.
U can be asexual and straight tho, its usually just an undercategory of straight/gay/bi I guess 
depends on definition i guess, like if you want to identify as straight do what u wanna do, but in my opinion straight = heterosexual and hetero romantic if you want to use the split attraction model (which is a whole other discussion) and asexual isn't in the straight category. Everything is a spectrum, etc blabla and it's debatable where the whole demisexual, gray-whatever stuff falls (which is why I'm not sure all those super specific labels are even helpful anymore), but asexuals belong in the lgtb+ community in my opinion.
16
Posts: 17933
Date: 01-01-2022 13:11
Private
Princess of Pop



Arthema wrote:
Koolaid wrote:
Abby wrote:
Koolaid wrote:
haha lol, i felt like the hijab one and the gender one would be most controversial and was kind of afraid to post them but i'm surprised most ppl reacted positive/neutral
I mean... I grew up in a very religious house and now that I'm out of it,
while I'm not an atheist... that shit is just... no.
and the hijab is "believing" you respect your religion.. connected to religion ofc
if the religion is oppressing women and a woman believes in it... lmao yeah that aint it sister
that's fine! i was raised religious too and this is how i see it:

i believe religion is very much about opressing women. of course, im not so radical to think that woman oppression is its central dogma, but yes, since religion is part of society, and Especially since it was created in an era that was so traditional and long ago; a lot of its beliefs have mysogynistic values. 

things such as premarital sex, covering yourself for God, are ideas that are not for this day and age anymore. and if women don't hold themselves to those scriptures, they get punished much more severely than men


no matter how i re-frame it, i think the very idea that only a woman should wear a hijab, but not a man, is sexist. i would have been fine if both men and women have to do it, like sikhism. but i cannot get behind this.


(ofc it's fine to disagree, again, just wanted to clarify my point)
nah nothing to disagree with here,
100% facts
17
Posts: 39197
Date: 01-01-2022 13:57
Private
Princess of Pop



Arthema wrote:
cryin9cat wrote:
i can just tell how none of yall actually read about islam
Today's Islam that is actually implemented is not what is truly being worshipped
same with other religions
those religions are being used as tools to be in charge and have power over people,
the Quran can say that all men and women are equal, but men act like women are beneath them.
while the Quran has some beautiful things in it,
some people that involved with Islam has tainted it and made it all about power
and ofc it's not just Islam, it's so unfortunate as a lot of religions have something powerful in their core but some stuff is just like... huuhhhh????
17
Posts: 39197
Date: 01-01-2022 14:01
Private
Princess of Pop



Arthema wrote:
hmm 12 is interesting
I wanna know why is that you're thinking this way.
I guess as a person on the ace spectrum or whatever it's called, I hate those labels and don't identify as a part of the community, but would love to hear a bit more about it.
17
Posts: 39197
Date: 01-01-2022 14:04
Private
Popstar



Koolaid wrote:
Hatchling wrote:
Plastic surgery for anything but reconstruction or life-threatening reasons is bad and often addictive. It also almost always just reaffirms the eurocentric beauty standards. It also seems like in today's society the body is seen as a fashion accessory instead of an actual human body and is regularly treated as such, doing life-threatening surgeries for the vainest stupid things. (Like a BLL's which I honestly think shouldn't even be allowed) It is also often done for the male gaze and honestly, no one has been able to convince me otherwise... 
yes also agree
17
Posts: 14620
Date: 01-01-2022 14:05
Private
Popstar



Koolaid wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
kinda scared for your opinion on nb people lol
@Sylvan i copied this from someone else cause they said it rlly well and i honestly can't say it better so;

I know this is an extremely delicate issue, and I truly do not want to hurt anyone, but I get so frustrated with the way that the LGBT community talks about gender.One of my issues is this idea that gender is some innate spectrum of feelings thal exists in nature, rather than a social construct.

But what would "woman" even feel like? How would you define or even vaguely describe this innate sense of feeling that makes one a woman? It doesn't exist. And nobody perfectly conforms to societal expectations of gender, especially the rigid, performative standards of femininity.

I remember back in 2020 sccing a video of aperson asking if they were not a woman, but instead non-binary,because they don't feel an innate, personal connection with she/ her pronouns, it justnever bothered them to be referred to as she/her, and they didn't think about it until they "realized" they were supposed to. But that's literally being a cis person. Nobody is innately connected to socially constructed, gendered language.

So now, we have people who are completely indistinguishable from gender conforming cispeople in literally every way except labels, calling themselves trans. And I don't think it's right to appropriate the label of an incredibly oppressed minority with very specific material needs, turning it into an abstract identity that literally anyone and everyone can choose to fit into

They do not face any form of transphobia or transmisogyny, nor do they have the same material needs as trans people, simply because they don't feel a particular way.


And I totally understand rejecting gender as an abolitionist, political position! But it doesn't necessarily make you a member of an opressed minority.
17
Posts: 14620
Date: 01-01-2022 14:16 | Times changed: 2
Private
Popstar



Koolaid wrote:
also she uses nb as an example but this holds for all neogenders
17
Posts: 14620
Date: 01-01-2022 14:18
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use