You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Private
 Head on over to my wd and style me! I need something not christmas (I pay)
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
11 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Tw bunny just wants to state
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
ouch wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
Ok so fox news had a segment claiming the term "birthing person" erases mothers 

Lol wtf
I get it in a sense but ppl should call themselves whatever they want, birthing person is just less personal so I see why ppl would feel "erased" or whatever by not calling themselves a mother 
I dont think anyone advocating for inclusive language is saying ppl dont have the right to call themselves mother, ppl have the right to say birthing person if they want tho 

Personally think birthing person recognizes trans men or even that not all mothers give birth, like come on dont erase pregnant trans ppl faux news 

Also the 'xx' comment was me saying I prefer 'afab' lol
Yes idc what ppl call themselves 
16
Posts: 95664
Date: 12-11-2021 16:53
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
ouch wrote:
I think norwegian doesn't rlly have anything equivalent to female, the only thing is hunn, like hunndyr (female animal) but 🤔 theres rlly no way to use that abt a human, u could say hunnmenneske (female human) but its not rlly a word or gramatically correct (?) and never heard anyone ise it before, people way kvinnemenneske (woman human) or kvinne (woman) instead n that is a normal word to use for women. Or dame but thats just the same as kvinne 
Oh interesting thats its own route to explore
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 12-11-2021 16:53
Klavier
Minister of Pop



Klavier wrote:
i read a book once and now my brain wont fit in my head kek ! : ( 
23
Posts: 49077
Date: 12-11-2021 16:53
Hmm
National Star



hmm wrote:
Klavier wrote:
i read a book once and now my brain wont fit in my head kek ! : ( 
kek
15
Posts: 31498
Date: 12-11-2021 16:54
Klavier
Minister of Pop



Klavier wrote:
Terrified wrote:
Klavier wrote:
i read a book once and now my brain wont fit in my head kek ! : ( 
kek
lel ! : (
23
Posts: 49077
Date: 12-11-2021 16:54
Hmm
National Star



hmm wrote:
Klavier I say it's because men have compressed your skull 
15
Posts: 31498
Date: 12-11-2021 16:54
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
Also I havent read the second sex but I should 

Its second wave feminism so be critical its old but there is definitely some knowledge you can apply to modern theory 
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 12-11-2021 16:55
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
Klavier wrote:
i read a book once and now my brain wont fit in my head kek ! : ( 
big brain so smart
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 12-11-2021 16:55
Anachronism
National Star



Anachronism wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
Also I havent read the second sex but I should 

Its second wave feminism so be critical its old but there is definitely some knowledge you can apply to modern theory 
Im really only familiar with that "one is not born- but rather- becomes a woman" or w/e quote 

I think it's important to read different POV to broaden your perspective and to gain knowledge of history you know? Like I read books not expecting to agree just to understand where the author is coming from, I read "the war on boys" for that reason 
17
Posts: 24229
Date: 12-11-2021 16:58
Anachronism
National Star



Anachronism wrote:
Like "the feminine mystique" isnt relevant today but its interesting to see women were fighting for in the 60s and how they were treated when they had few rights to work 
17
Posts: 24229
Date: 12-11-2021 16:59
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
Also I havent read the second sex but I should 

Its second wave feminism so be critical its old but there is definitely some knowledge you can apply to modern theory 
Im really only familiar with that "one is not born- but rather- becomes a woman" or w/e quote 

I think it's important to read different POV to broaden your perspective and to gain knowledge of history you know? Like I read books not expecting to agree just to understand where the author is coming from, I read "the war on boys" for that reason 
she has some good points and if you get the time add it to ur list
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 12-11-2021 16:59
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
ouch wrote:
I think norwegian doesn't rlly have anything equivalent to female, the only thing is hunn, like hunndyr (female animal) but 🤔 theres rlly no way to use that abt a human, u could say hunnmenneske (female human) but its not rlly a word or gramatically correct (?) and never heard anyone ise it before, people way kvinnemenneske (woman human) or kvinne (woman) instead n that is a normal word to use for women. Or dame but thats just the same as kvinne 
Oh interesting thats its own route to explore
Oh wait a female human is hunkjønn, but I don't view that as offensive, tho nobody uses it. Kvinne is a grown hunkjønn (can be used towards girls too to seperate them from males but) but wikipedia says its used for both cis and trans women, so I think it just depends on what context u use kvinne in, if it means woman or female 
16
Posts: 95664
Date: 12-11-2021 17:01
Anachronism
National Star



Anachronism wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:

Its second wave feminism so be critical its old but there is definitely some knowledge you can apply to modern theory 
Im really only familiar with that "one is not born- but rather- becomes a woman" or w/e quote 

I think it's important to read different POV to broaden your perspective and to gain knowledge of history you know? Like I read books not expecting to agree just to understand where the author is coming from, I read "the war on boys" for that reason 
she has some good points and if you get the time add it to ur list
It's been on my lists for years 

Do you think she would support gender performative theory? Or did? Cuz I would agree people are not born women but I havent read the book, I need to, idk what she means 

I need to read andrea dworkin too just to gain perspective (and I'm not a second wave radfem at all)
17
Posts: 24229
Date: 12-11-2021 17:01 | Times changed: 2
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
Anachronism wrote:
Im really only familiar with that "one is not born- but rather- becomes a woman" or w/e quote 

I think it's important to read different POV to broaden your perspective and to gain knowledge of history you know? Like I read books not expecting to agree just to understand where the author is coming from, I read "the war on boys" for that reason 
she has some good points and if you get the time add it to ur list
It's been on my lists for years 

Do you think she would support gender performative theory? Or did? Cuz I would agree people are not born women but I havent read the book, I need to, idk what she means 

I need to read andrea dworkin too just to gain perspective (and I'm not a second wave feminist at all)

A heavy amount of conversation would go into this but as a short answers no I think so in the sense that gender is not a stable way to define oneself and copied behavior changes over geological and time and is not the only way to express ones gender identity
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 12-11-2021 17:11
BunnyButts
International Star



BunnyButts wrote:
take that statement with a grain of salt I cant speak for a dead women
20
Posts: 22712
Date: 12-11-2021 17:11
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use