ouch wrote:Koolaid wrote:ouch wrote:
Claires Afganistan take kinda similar to what I voted the other day for norwegian election thing mby. But hers is rooted in feminism (I guess??) But not mine. ANYWAYS, stricter immigration laws and requirements. Proper training in language, get a job etc bla bla bla. I think we legit have courses for the men to not be misogynistic allegedly. I feel like w that solution, u could take Afghani men into the us too, just gotta have control. Not free flow of ppl w very different view on women n other stuff. Tho this is allegedly islamophobic and racist but whatever
it's interesting cause i think yes help the refugees but also an incontrolled intake of more ppl only leads to bad living conditions for them cause which government has money and place for all of them lol we're literally sinking in internal problems BUT yeah training and making sure they dont end up in cycles of impoverty which also makes them more prone to terrorist recruitmentp
Helping them get jobs (or making it a requirement to get a job to live here), language courses, mixing up the locations of where u put ppl, proper training in norwegian (american here tho) culture and values, is the most important stuff imo. Good immigration is vital, cus u often see, at least here, more refugees are misogynistic, homophobic, gang violence (amongst youth in places which r dominated by refugees), live on welfare, etc etc compared to ppl who are born here.
I don't have any issue taking in immigrants, but if ur not gonna integrate them properly, I would rather just take in none
its so messed up bc countries want the gold stars for taking in immigrants but neglect to integrate them properly. then these immigrants grow up to be "bad examples" so inhabitants are like fuck no no more immigrants aaaaa