You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Helmi
Why are mp prices so crazy.. YES Iā€™m looking at you šŸ«µ
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
11 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page:
what do u think of this
Private
Youtube star



Delusion1111111 wrote:
Nesta wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
i am very against claiming that 'overpopulation' is a problem or that there r 'too many pp' on the planet.Ā  but overpopulation COULD b viewed as a symptom of a problem . i think what ppl dont rly consider is that poverty (such as the conditions that many ppl face in these countries where 'overpopulation' is seen as a problem i.e. in the global south) is something that causes families to hav more children in the first place. n in this way, capitalism can b seen as partially creating the 'problem' . poor ppl have lots of children for various reasons n eliminating the poverty aspect could reduce the number of children ppl have to have. but like i mean it is definitely fucked up arguing that 'poor ppl shouldnt have the right to have children' which is where the overpopulation argument essentially frequently leads. PLUS there is reason to believe that the sharp increase in the global population will like reach a......whats the word...plateau. like it will naturally level off soon anyway
I agree with everything but the last.
yeah tbh i dont remember where i heard that and if i necessarily am 10000% in agreement. what r ur reasons for not agreeing
13
Posts: 6348
Date: 15-11-2020 01:59
Account deleted




wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
Nesta wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
i am very against claiming that 'overpopulation' is a problem or that there r 'too many pp' on the planet.Ā  but overpopulation COULD b viewed as a symptom of a problem . i think what ppl dont rly consider is that poverty (such as the conditions that many ppl face in these countries where 'overpopulation' is seen as a problem i.e. in the global south) is something that causes families to hav more children in the first place. n in this way, capitalism can b seen as partially creating the 'problem' . poor ppl have lots of children for various reasons n eliminating the poverty aspect could reduce the number of children ppl have to have. but like i mean it is definitely fucked up arguing that 'poor ppl shouldnt have the right to have children' which is where the overpopulation argument essentially frequently leads. PLUS there is reason to believe that the sharp increase in the global population will like reach a......whats the word...plateau. like it will naturally level off soon anyway
I agree with everything but the last.
yeah tbh i dont remember where i heard that and if i necessarily am 10000% in agreement. what r ur reasons for not agreeing
I think it has too many variables. Like sperm quality is already reducing but it doesn't stop people from getting help to get pregnant, etc. And should we deny them that if it came to a point where the population will stop to grow naturally fx? And are there any guarantees that the platau will hit within a reasonable time in regards to climate breakdown or will it be a 100 more years, which basically all models says are too late if we want to prevent irreversible damage on so many issues? Will it even have time to hit before we are taken out by other things? And how will it level off naturally? There are so many ways that can happen. I don't trust the world to naturally regulate itself when humans over again have shown its willingness to override it for a different value or concern.Ā 
Date: 15-11-2020 02:44
Private
World famous



Versailles wrote:
abolish billionaires yucki yuckĀ 
20
Posts: 6859
Date: 15-11-2020 02:58
Private
Youtube star



Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Both sides are right and wrong:Ā 

Over-populationĀ 
I wish I could write something smart like Nesta but I hate people and there are too many idiots please stop breeding I cannot take it anymore, the world doesn't need your stupid offspring it will only result in a pandemic worse than this to ensure that the amount of people decreases. Egoistic assholes.Ā 

CapitalismĀ 
Egoistic assholes again.Ā 
hmmmmm
end humanity 2k21Ā 
*sprays you with water*Ā no snusmumrikken
16
Posts: 9825
Date: 15-11-2020 03:55
Laboratory
World famous



Laboratory wrote:
2 birds w/ one rock: lets kill all the capitalists
19
Posts: 72150
Date: 15-11-2020 04:16
Private
World famous



remains wrote:
ya i agree

only if there was some way to tax the rich
idk let's just use the guillotine i guess
22
Posts: 40080
Date: 15-11-2020 05:43
Private
National star



Imani wrote:
i think both sides are wrong. shares aren't gonna feed people, and it's wishful thinking to believe that distribution is the only problem with our level of consumption and waste, especially when western lifestyle is the goal. butĀ i don't think we should stop people from having children. the best we can do is put energy towards family planning, women's rights, healthcare and education in the countries that need it
15
Posts: 2268
Date: 15-11-2020 06:49 | Times changed: 1
Account deleted




wrote:
there are too many people and billionaires are a problem because they use too many resources. Those statements can co-exist.
Date: 15-11-2020 09:57
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page:
Ā© 2024 Terms of Use