You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Helmi
Why are mp prices so crazy.. YES I’m looking at you 🫵
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
18 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General Page: | Next | Last
what do u think of this
Private
Youtube star



Limbs wrote:
16
Posts: 9825
Date: 15-11-2020 00:12
Account deleted




wrote:
These are my two cents:

Like capitalism clearly sucks and it's fucked and poor countries are blamed for having "too many children, too many people in a place, etc." while consuming little of our total resource usage in the first place. But I still have to like the question: what is the goal we are aiming for? Is the goal to bring everyone up to western standards of wealth, etc.* because y es, we are too many then working inside today's systems. Then we are already "too many" because the world is already deteriorating bc of western overconsumption and capitalistic practices. But is that really the fault of the population or the fault of the way things are done? Like I don't feel like I am even close to educated enough on climate solutions to be able to discuss any realistic solution that has the capacity to deal with the diversity of the world. Or to say on how reducing x and x sectors would at a point tip a scale. I dunno know this.
(*I don't want to assume that all people want western standards but I hope it makes the point.)

I think that within at least ecology, there is a point known as the areas "bærekraftsevne" (how much tearing an area and population of x animal can take before the resources are depleted, sicknesses spread more easily and they start dying out.) It happens in all animal populations and when it gets too much, the population starts reducing until it can be sustained by the current resources in that area - if that so is by migrating or dying - and then it starts growing again when their needs are better met again. Like do we stretch it to a global point and a global economy, you will wonder: where is this space humans have not been? Where can we go if we destroy the whole world as it is, make it less habitable for the human-animal? People are already climate refugees. At a point, there will most likely be too little land and too much tearing on it at the same time. One of those things will most likely be humans. 
Date: 15-11-2020 00:40 | Times changed: 1
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Both sides are right and wrong: 

Over-population 
I wish I could write something smart like Nesta but I hate people and there are too many idiots please stop breeding I cannot take it anymore, the world doesn't need your stupid offspring it will only result in a pandemic worse than this to ensure that the amount of people decreases. Egoistic assholes. 

Capitalism 
Egoistic assholes again. 
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 15-11-2020 00:45
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
Theres too many pol
16
Posts: 95491
Date: 15-11-2020 00:48
Private
World famous



BloomCissi wrote:
Both of them are problems.
20
Posts: 24750
Date: 15-11-2020 00:54
Private
Youtube star



Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Both sides are right and wrong: 

Over-population 
I wish I could write something smart like Nesta but I hate people and there are too many idiots please stop breeding I cannot take it anymore, the world doesn't need your stupid offspring it will only result in a pandemic worse than this to ensure that the amount of people decreases. Egoistic assholes. 

Capitalism 
Egoistic assholes again. 
hmmmmm
16
Posts: 9825
Date: 15-11-2020 01:22
MissLondon
World famous



MissLondon wrote:
I guess I appreciate those who care about this because I don't... mainly because I'm aiming for billionaire status too. 
20
Posts: 27725
Date: 15-11-2020 01:36
Account deleted




wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
I guess I appreciate those who care about this because I don't... mainly because I'm aiming for billionaire status too. 
I spat
Date: 15-11-2020 01:37
GenderTeam
World famous



GenderTeam wrote:
i agree w it
21
Posts: 32414
Date: 15-11-2020 01:40
Private
Youtube star



Delusion1111111 wrote:
i am very against claiming that 'overpopulation' is a problem or that there r 'too many pp' on the planet.  but overpopulation COULD b viewed as a symptom of a problem . i think what ppl dont rly consider is that poverty (such as the conditions that many ppl face in these countries where 'overpopulation' is seen as a problem i.e. in the global south) is something that causes families to hav more children in the first place. n in this way, capitalism can b seen as partially creating the 'problem' . poor ppl have lots of children for various reasons n eliminating the poverty aspect could reduce the number of children ppl have to have. but like i mean it is definitely fucked up arguing that 'poor ppl shouldnt have the right to have children' which is where the overpopulation argument essentially frequently leads. PLUS there is reason to believe that the sharp increase in the global population will like reach a......whats the word...plateau. like it will naturally level off soon anyway
13
Posts: 6348
Date: 15-11-2020 01:46
Private
Youtube star



Delusion1111111 wrote:
ugh i wish i could find this interesting article but impossible mission
13
Posts: 6348
Date: 15-11-2020 01:47
GenderTeam
World famous



GenderTeam wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
i am very against claiming that 'overpopulation' is a problem or that there r 'too many pp' on the planet.  but overpopulation COULD b viewed as a symptom of a problem . i think what ppl dont rly consider is that poverty (such as the conditions that many ppl face in these countries where 'overpopulation' is seen as a problem i.e. in the global south) is something that causes families to hav more children in the first place. n in this way, capitalism can b seen as partially creating the 'problem' . poor ppl have lots of children for various reasons n eliminating the poverty aspect could reduce the number of children ppl have to have. but like i mean it is definitely fucked up arguing that 'poor ppl shouldnt have the right to have children' which is where the overpopulation argument essentially frequently leads. PLUS there is reason to believe that the sharp increase in the global population will like reach a......whats the word...plateau. like it will naturally level off soon anyway
literally what i was thinking but was too lazy to write jsjsjjddkks 
my brain was just like Poor country cus of colonialism n capitalism Poor access to education Poor acces to birth control Need many children to keep u alive when ur old
21
Posts: 32414
Date: 15-11-2020 01:48
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Limbs wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Both sides are right and wrong: 

Over-population 
I wish I could write something smart like Nesta but I hate people and there are too many idiots please stop breeding I cannot take it anymore, the world doesn't need your stupid offspring it will only result in a pandemic worse than this to ensure that the amount of people decreases. Egoistic assholes. 

Capitalism 
Egoistic assholes again. 
hmmmmm
end humanity 2k21 
19
Posts: 108086
Date: 15-11-2020 01:55
Private
Youtube star



Delusion1111111 wrote:
diarrhea wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
i am very against claiming that 'overpopulation' is a problem or that there r 'too many pp' on the planet.  but overpopulation COULD b viewed as a symptom of a problem . i think what ppl dont rly consider is that poverty (such as the conditions that many ppl face in these countries where 'overpopulation' is seen as a problem i.e. in the global south) is something that causes families to hav more children in the first place. n in this way, capitalism can b seen as partially creating the 'problem' . poor ppl have lots of children for various reasons n eliminating the poverty aspect could reduce the number of children ppl have to have. but like i mean it is definitely fucked up arguing that 'poor ppl shouldnt have the right to have children' which is where the overpopulation argument essentially frequently leads. PLUS there is reason to believe that the sharp increase in the global population will like reach a......whats the word...plateau. like it will naturally level off soon anyway
literally what i was thinking but was too lazy to write jsjsjjddkks 
my brain was just like Poor country cus of colonialism n capitalism Poor access to education Poor acces to birth control Need many children to keep u alive when ur old
just realised i wrote 'i am very against claiming that... there r too many 'pp' in the world' right yes 
13
Posts: 6348
Date: 15-11-2020 01:56
GenderTeam
World famous



GenderTeam wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
diarrhea wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
i am very against claiming that 'overpopulation' is a problem or that there r 'too many pp' on the planet.  but overpopulation COULD b viewed as a symptom of a problem . i think what ppl dont rly consider is that poverty (such as the conditions that many ppl face in these countries where 'overpopulation' is seen as a problem i.e. in the global south) is something that causes families to hav more children in the first place. n in this way, capitalism can b seen as partially creating the 'problem' . poor ppl have lots of children for various reasons n eliminating the poverty aspect could reduce the number of children ppl have to have. but like i mean it is definitely fucked up arguing that 'poor ppl shouldnt have the right to have children' which is where the overpopulation argument essentially frequently leads. PLUS there is reason to believe that the sharp increase in the global population will like reach a......whats the word...plateau. like it will naturally level off soon anyway
literally what i was thinking but was too lazy to write jsjsjjddkks 
my brain was just like Poor country cus of colonialism n capitalism Poor access to education Poor acces to birth control Need many children to keep u alive when ur old
just realised i wrote 'i am very against claiming that... there r too many 'pp' in the world' right yes 
IM LAUGHIBG SOHA TD RN JDDJDJ
21
Posts: 32414
Date: 15-11-2020 01:58
Account deleted




wrote:
Delusion1111111 wrote:
i am very against claiming that 'overpopulation' is a problem or that there r 'too many pp' on the planet.  but overpopulation COULD b viewed as a symptom of a problem . i think what ppl dont rly consider is that poverty (such as the conditions that many ppl face in these countries where 'overpopulation' is seen as a problem i.e. in the global south) is something that causes families to hav more children in the first place. n in this way, capitalism can b seen as partially creating the 'problem' . poor ppl have lots of children for various reasons n eliminating the poverty aspect could reduce the number of children ppl have to have. but like i mean it is definitely fucked up arguing that 'poor ppl shouldnt have the right to have children' which is where the overpopulation argument essentially frequently leads. PLUS there is reason to believe that the sharp increase in the global population will like reach a......whats the word...plateau. like it will naturally level off soon anyway
I agree with everything but the last. 
Date: 15-11-2020 01:58
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
Page: | Next | Last
© 2024 Terms of Use