You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Dew
lower the dm price back to 100 and stop pissing me off
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
13 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Monarchy: for or against?
Private
World famous



Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
imagine being born into a job
man i wish tho tbh lmao
21
Posts: 55658
Date: 14-07-2020 19:16
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
Idk if its even possible but I would be more mad if the monarch were using his veto right or smth like if they were operating not as a democracy
Then I would b a lil mad I guess 
16
Posts: 93582
Date: 14-07-2020 19:18
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Claire wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
imagine being born into a job
man i wish tho tbh lmao
much more convenient 
19
Posts: 107570
Date: 14-07-2020 19:20
Pavlov
International star



Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
15
Posts: 29813
Date: 14-07-2020 19:20 | Times changed: 1
Pavlov
International star



Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
i have no idea what france did though, no clue
15
Posts: 29813
Date: 14-07-2020 19:21
Pavlov
International star



Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
i have no idea what france did though, no clue
no wait france has a president as well, what country was it that had a prime minister without a monarch, did i hallucinate it
15
Posts: 29813
Date: 14-07-2020 19:23
Pavlov
International star



Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
i have no idea what france did though, no clue
no wait france has a president as well, what country was it that had a prime minister without a monarch, did i hallucinate it
no but honestly i think we are better off seperating the head of state and head of government, as it wont get any cheaper having a combined head of state and head of government
15
Posts: 29813
Date: 14-07-2020 19:25
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
if the monarchs do nothing we might as well have a seagull as head of state
19
Posts: 107570
Date: 14-07-2020 19:27
Pavlov
International star



Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
i have no idea what france did though, no clue
no wait france has a president as well, what country was it that had a prime minister without a monarch, did i hallucinate it
no but honestly i think we are better off seperating the head of state and head of government, as it wont get any cheaper having a combined head of state and head of government
or you can do like france and seperate the head from the head of state 😂😂😂😂😂😂
15
Posts: 29813
Date: 14-07-2020 19:28
Pavlov
International star



Pavlov wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
if the monarchs do nothing we might as well have a seagull as head of state
yeah but you would still have to pay that seagull
15
Posts: 29813
Date: 14-07-2020 19:28
Private
International star



wug wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
if the monarchs do nothing we might as well have a seagull as head of state
yeah but you would still have to pay that seagull
no
19
Posts: 107570
Date: 14-07-2020 19:28
MissLondon
World famous



MissLondon wrote:
Nope!
That might be vague, I'm for it
20
Posts: 27526
Date: 14-07-2020 19:29 | Times changed: 1
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
Snusmumrikken wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
anyway i feel like ive said this countless times but im pretty sure you cant just abolish the royal family without making norway a republic, and that would mean having a president instead of a prime minister. which ive heard is more expensive than having a combination of a prime minister and a monarch
ok so from a couple of minute of reading ive understood that you have the head of state which is the king in norways case and head of government that is the prime minister. in america for example the president is both head of state and head of government. if you were to remove the head of state, i feel like you would have to get a president to replace the role of both prime minister and monarch
if the monarchs do nothing we might as well have a seagull as head of state
King does stuff tho he say yes this is fine to stortingets proposals 
16
Posts: 93582
Date: 14-07-2020 19:30
Pavlov
International star



Pavlov wrote:
i like how no one reads what i wrote despite being the only one who is actually looking into the possibiltiies of disbanding the monarchy
15
Posts: 29813
Date: 14-07-2020 19:30
Private
Popstar



ouch wrote:
Pavlov wrote:
i like how no one reads what i wrote despite being the only one who is actually looking into the possibiltiies of disbanding the monarchy
I read it tho I didn't feel the need to add anything 
16
Posts: 93582
Date: 14-07-2020 19:31
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
© 2023 Terms of Use