He made pictures of like advertisements on the streets and then cut it out differently and hung it up under his name (and made a lot of money on it lol) And also pictures of instagram posts
DaddyIssues wrote: Isn't it a little like what Freddy Fabris did with the renaissance paintings? Taking someone else work and "frame" it in a way that it becomes your own?
yeah I think it's like public property bc it's advertisements same for instagram posts apparently
"This means that Instagram can license images from the site to others – including other Instagram users who can 'regram' images (repost photos) from accounts that they follow without infringing copyright"Â
DaddyIssues wrote: Isn't it a little like what Freddy Fabris did with the renaissance paintings? (Except he didn't do anything illegal). Taking someone else work and "frame" it in a way that it becomes your own?
Azriel wrote: its so double bc on one side he is very much allowed to and like the actual photographers are aware of this but on the other side like ?? morally ? and if it brings over a message to the audience like hey yk ur shit can be used for this .. hmm