Limbs wrote: if you have a couple, and one partner makes $50,000 per year while the other makes $150,000 per year, do you think it's fairer to split costs 50/50 or 33%/66%? if you were in that relationship, what would you do?
Ataraxia wrote: if i was the one makin 150k id pay for more because i can afford it better, but if i was the one makin less id never forgive myself for letting them pay more.
Rotte wrote: I would personally do 50/50 and let my partner choose if they wanna chip in that more for like food or such. I would the the same the other way around
Angelica wrote: I would personally do 50/50 and let my partner choose if they wanna chip in that more for like food or such. I would the the same the other way around
kagura wrote: i haven't ever been with a person who makes so much more or less than me that it would matter so i don't know. i guess 50/50, but if i was the one making more i would probably be happy to pay more and i think that's just logical
disposable wrote: i think 33/66, because then the partner who makes less has the ability to save more money which can be good for both in the future. if u want to, say, renovate or buy something new
Angelica wrote: I would personally do 50/50 and let my partner choose if they wanna chip in that more for like food or such. I would the the same the other way around