Maxwell wrote:
Sylvan wrote:
I was just abt to mention
oatmilk wrote:
I think the nazi uniform was worse tbhtoraix wrote:
very true. in my opinion making content/art/sets that represent your aesthetics and themes you want to do isnt automatically romantication. obviously this conversation has a lot of nuance and the context of a dress up game that was more towards teens at the time is also kind of iffy. anyway today's vp is more +18 anyway so i see no issues with it in current day. i think "basic" bruising ect don't warrant a content warning here since we also have gore ect which also can be a kink based thing. obviously anything can be but i think the two are pretty comparable.
hm yeah i mean idk i think theres just smth about this one persons set and the way he made i think actually every set he made related to his kink that was kinda odd and again i think it played into a larger romatcisation that was going on at the time, obv every artist is different but yeahvery true. in my opinion making content/art/sets that represent your aesthetics and themes you want to do isnt automatically romantication. obviously this conversation has a lot of nuance and the context of a dress up game that was more towards teens at the time is also kind of iffy. anyway today's vp is more +18 anyway so i see no issues with it in current day. i think "basic" bruising ect don't warrant a content warning here since we also have gore ect which also can be a kink based thing. obviously anything can be but i think the two are pretty comparable.