You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
LexiLuvsKirby
Hi Im desperate and my discord is beantoes2000 if u are bored say hi
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
Forum
Startalk
Blog statistics
Friends management



Topics   Messages
16 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
I hate how soft ppl on here are
Private
Living Legend



Maxwell wrote:
my own thread was a jumpscareĀ 
17
Posts: 34308
Date: 27-01-2026 02:09
Private
Youtube Star



devilcake wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
You can disagree and dislike whomeverĀ 
That's not the issue here
Sorry but with the way you type I donā€™t rly understand what ur trying to say most of the time /gen so idk what you find to be the issue
Maybe this will help you understandĀ 
I saved you the trouble of searching...page 20 is where you reference me
I don't need you to like me or your approval to be here
But it's how you attempt to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately lol
en.virtualpopstar.com/social?category=2&topic=368484

I have a show to watch, will respond later
I donā€™t see an issue here because it is not trying to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately itā€™s making a joke about habit that atp had been going on for years of saying smth like ā€œI am not phobicā€ every time someone pointed out smth you say is x-phobic. A new thread doesnā€™t erase all previous interactions Iā€™ve had with or have seen from a person, to me.
19
Posts: 195823
Date: 27-01-2026 02:17
Elisia
Youtube Star



elisia wrote:
devilcake wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
Sorry but with the way you type I donā€™t rly understand what ur trying to say most of the time /gen so idk what you find to be the issue
Maybe this will help you understandĀ 
I saved you the trouble of searching...page 20 is where you reference me
I don't need you to like me or your approval to be here
But it's how you attempt to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately lol
en.virtualpopstar.com/social?category=2&topic=368484

I have a show to watch, will respond later
I donā€™t see an issue here because it is not trying to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately itā€™s making a joke about habit that atp had been going on for years of saying smth like ā€œI am not phobicā€ every time someone pointed out smth you say is x-phobic. A new thread doesnā€™t erase all previous interactions Iā€™ve had with or have seen from a person, to me.
Its because your bias is incredibly narrow
And you immediately jump to it being -phobic
And dont let things go...
But youre so based and everything you say is right and better than the other opion /s (this line only)

However. It was not you who name dropped in that thread, but you definitely did not help
And "debates" with you are exhausting
(light hearted + honest + exhausted + tired of fighting what ever those tone indicators are)
15
Posts: 1187
Date: 27-01-2026 02:54
Olympus
Popstar



Olympus wrote:
me trying to catch up rn
18
Posts: 3540
Date: 27-01-2026 03:02
Private
Living Legend



Maxwell wrote:
Olympus wrote:
me trying to catch up rn
x
AHAAHH
same
I have many things to say but
but no mind to say it!
17
Posts: 34308
Date: 27-01-2026 03:10
Private
Youtube Star



devilcake wrote:
elisia wrote:
devilcake wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
Maybe this will help you understandĀ 
I saved you the trouble of searching...page 20 is where you reference me
I don't need you to like me or your approval to be here
But it's how you attempt to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately lol
en.virtualpopstar.com/social?category=2&topic=368484

I have a show to watch, will respond later
I donā€™t see an issue here because it is not trying to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately itā€™s making a joke about habit that atp had been going on for years of saying smth like ā€œI am not phobicā€ every time someone pointed out smth you say is x-phobic. A new thread doesnā€™t erase all previous interactions Iā€™ve had with or have seen from a person, to me.
Its because your bias is incredibly narrow
And you immediately jump to it being -phobic
And dont let things go...
But youre so based and everything you say is right and better than the other opion /s (this line only)

However. It was not you who name dropped in that thread, but you definitely did not help
And "debates" with you are exhausting
(light hearted + honest + exhausted + tired of fighting what ever those tone indicators are)
These are just your thoughts on me as a person I donā€™t really see the relation to what I said or how it explains what misslondon was trying to say.

i donā€™t let things go when I fundamentally disagree with someone on a moral issue or politically, at least not/especially not when thereā€™s been repeats of that behaviour/talking points etc at which point yes I may have a bias against a person but thatā€™s just how interacting with people works?Ā 

but again I donā€™t really see what the point here is beyond criticizing me which is fine igā€¦

/all is neu
19
Posts: 195823
Date: 27-01-2026 03:24
MissLondon
Queen of Queens



MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
Sorry but with the way you type I donā€™t rly understand what ur trying to say most of the time /gen so idk what you find to be the issue
Maybe this will help you understandĀ 
I saved you the trouble of searching...page 20 is where you reference me
I don't need you to like me or your approval to be here
But it's how you attempt to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately lol
en.virtualpopstar.com/social?category=2&topic=368484

I have a show to watch, will respond later
I donā€™t see an issue here because it is not trying to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately itā€™s making a joke about habit that atp had been going on for years of saying smth like ā€œI am not phobicā€ every time someone pointed out smth you say is x-phobic. A new thread doesnā€™t erase all previous interactions Iā€™ve had with or have seen from a person, to me.
See pg 16 and define immediately lol
At least it's not totally personal becauseĀ 
you did the same to others as well.
The joke is not calling it what it really is
you were bothered by something I said
tried to shame me and I shamed you back
What's weird is you were told to chill by a mod
because told my comments weren't phobicĀ 
Years later, you still do it lol
20
Posts: 28175
Date: 27-01-2026 06:16
MissLondon
Queen of Queens



MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
elisia wrote:
devilcake wrote:
I donā€™t see an issue here because it is not trying to shame/intimidate someone almost immediately itā€™s making a joke about habit that atp had been going on for years of saying smth like ā€œI am not phobicā€ every time someone pointed out smth you say is x-phobic. A new thread doesnā€™t erase all previous interactions Iā€™ve had with or have seen from a person, to me.
Its because your bias is incredibly narrow
And you immediately jump to it being -phobic
And dont let things go...
But youre so based and everything you say is right and better than the other opion /s (this line only)

However. It was not you who name dropped in that thread, but you definitely did not help
And "debates" with you are exhausting
(light hearted + honest + exhausted + tired of fighting what ever those tone indicators are)
These are just your thoughts on me as a person I donā€™t really see the relation to what I said or how it explains what misslondon was trying to say.

i donā€™t let things go when I fundamentally disagree with someone on a moral issue or politically, at least not/especially not when thereā€™s been repeats of that behaviour/talking points etc at which point yes I may have a bias against a person but thatā€™s just how interacting with people works?Ā 

but again I donā€™t really see what the point here is beyond criticizing me which is fine igā€¦

/all is neu
I forgot to check this yesterday. Just curious if you would respond to the last post
20
Posts: 28175
Date: 28-01-2026 22:44
Private
Living Legend



Maxwell wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
elisia wrote:
Its because your bias is incredibly narrow
And you immediately jump to it being -phobic
And dont let things go...
But youre so based and everything you say is right and better than the other opion /s (this line only)

However. It was not you who name dropped in that thread, but you definitely did not help
And "debates" with you are exhausting
(light hearted + honest + exhausted + tired of fighting what ever those tone indicators are)
These are just your thoughts on me as a person I donā€™t really see the relation to what I said or how it explains what misslondon was trying to say.

i donā€™t let things go when I fundamentally disagree with someone on a moral issue or politically, at least not/especially not when thereā€™s been repeats of that behaviour/talking points etc at which point yes I may have a bias against a person but thatā€™s just how interacting with people works?Ā 

but again I donā€™t really see what the point here is beyond criticizing me which is fine igā€¦

/all is neu
I forgot to check this yesterday. Just curious if you would respond to the last post
Taaag hiiiim
I wud but Im on phoone sad life 2 seconds
17
Posts: 34308
Date: 28-01-2026 22:46
MissLondon
Queen of Queens



MissLondon wrote:
Maxwell wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
These are just your thoughts on me as a person I donā€™t really see the relation to what I said or how it explains what misslondon was trying to say.

i donā€™t let things go when I fundamentally disagree with someone on a moral issue or politically, at least not/especially not when thereā€™s been repeats of that behaviour/talking points etc at which point yes I may have a bias against a person but thatā€™s just how interacting with people works?Ā 

but again I donā€™t really see what the point here is beyond criticizing me which is fine igā€¦

/all is neu
I forgot to check this yesterday. Just curious if you would respond to the last post
Taaag hiiiim
I wud but Im on phoone sad life 2 seconds
I can't taaag hiiiimĀ 
20
Posts: 28175
Date: 28-01-2026 23:02
Private
National Star



Dew wrote:
All I can say is I'm mad I missed out on that charlie kirk thread cause that was funny as hellĀ 
19
Posts: 6725
Date: 28-01-2026 23:38
Private
Youtube Star



devilcake wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
elisia wrote:
Its because your bias is incredibly narrow
And you immediately jump to it being -phobic
And dont let things go...
But youre so based and everything you say is right and better than the other opion /s (this line only)

However. It was not you who name dropped in that thread, but you definitely did not help
And "debates" with you are exhausting
(light hearted + honest + exhausted + tired of fighting what ever those tone indicators are)
These are just your thoughts on me as a person I donā€™t really see the relation to what I said or how it explains what misslondon was trying to say.

i donā€™t let things go when I fundamentally disagree with someone on a moral issue or politically, at least not/especially not when thereā€™s been repeats of that behaviour/talking points etc at which point yes I may have a bias against a person but thatā€™s just how interacting with people works?Ā 

but again I donā€™t really see what the point here is beyond criticizing me which is fine igā€¦

/all is neu
I forgot to check this yesterday. Just curious if you would respond to the last post
I opted not to reply because I still do not understand what youā€™re trying to so say in regards to what I initially said, youā€™re just vaguely pointing out old interactions Iā€™ve had that you donā€™t like as an explanation, and I have no desire to argue semantics about that thread with you considering you have repeatedly stated you do not care about anything said on here
19
Posts: 195823
Date: 29-01-2026 00:44
Private
Living Legend



Maxwell wrote:
devilcake wrote:
MissLondon wrote:
devilcake wrote:
These are just your thoughts on me as a person I donā€™t really see the relation to what I said or how it explains what misslondon was trying to say.

i donā€™t let things go when I fundamentally disagree with someone on a moral issue or politically, at least not/especially not when thereā€™s been repeats of that behaviour/talking points etc at which point yes I may have a bias against a person but thatā€™s just how interacting with people works?Ā 

but again I donā€™t really see what the point here is beyond criticizing me which is fine igā€¦

/all is neu
I forgot to check this yesterday. Just curious if you would respond to the last post
I opted not to reply because I still do not understand what youā€™re trying to so say in regards to what I initially said, youā€™re just vaguely pointing out old interactions Iā€™ve had that you donā€™t like as an explanation, and I have no desire to argue semantics about that thread with you considering you have repeatedly stated you do not care about anything said on here



she dont care abt us but she dooooes she managed to bring up my threeeaaad Im kinda honoredĀ 
17
Posts: 34308
Date: 29-01-2026 00:47
Olympus
Popstar



Olympus wrote:
what elisia said and what london said seem like they give the other context, Ā but i just woke up from nap so i don't have the braincells to piece that together
18
Posts: 3540
Date: 29-01-2026 01:11
Private
Living Legend



Maxwell wrote:
Olympus wrote:
what elisia said and what london said seem like they give the other context, Ā but i just woke up from nap so i don't have the braincells to piece that together
idek remember the contexts nd I think I was thereĀ 
17
Posts: 34308
Date: 29-01-2026 01:12
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Ā© 2026 Terms of Use