You have not yet responded to the forum.

Here you will find the last 3 forum topics
you have posted a comment on.
+ add shout
Dollzmaniac
harassment works
0 | 0 | 0 | 0
0%
To join the forums you need to be logged in.

Click here to register your own account for free and I will personally explain to you how you can start getting your own fans and, making popdollars.
> Close
Helper
17 of the 24 stars earned

Forum

General < General First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last
Please explain this to me.
Private
Princess of Pop



Alam wrote:
BunnyButts wrote:
brunhilde wrote:
the thread was still, albeit indirectly, about the warning and the first thread that got closed, which is against the rules. the problem with banners is that if you don't provide a translation alongside it every thread you write in - and the chance of someone finding the thread with the translation is very slim. in most forums i've visited there's a specific section for international discussion where it is alright to speak in your language without translation provided - the speakers of the language could then report any messages with rule breaking content in it. vp doesn't have one and isn't obligated to create one. you can talk shit about the actions the mods take but their sole job on this site is to enforce the rules the admins (or just kaj?? who knows) have set, and since it is owned by kaj, his word is "law" and he can do whatever he wants with the site. it's same as you visiting someone's house and breaking their rules, though i get that it's harder to comprehend virtually. if you don't like the rules then you don't have to stay in vp??

i've been a mod on another site so yeah i speak from experience. a lot of their job is backend aka you don't see or hear what they do. it's a thankless job but someone has to do it.
Tldr?

x

I am crying pls why
Aphrodite
World Famous



Hmm I get that mods are just doing their job but the rules are dumb af
I have also spoken in finnish in multiple forums without a translations and not once have i gotten a warning
The system just sucks ass and the mods are not being consistent, that's what's bothering me honestly
BunnyButts
International Star



Pls I think the over arching point is the fact that mods are on top of such a nonproblem but are literally absent at bigger problems 
Alam
World Famous



Aphrodite wrote:
Hmm I get that mods are just doing their job but the rules are dumb af
I have also spoken in finnish in multiple forums without a translations and not once have i gotten a warning
The system just sucks ass and the mods are not being consistent, that's what's bothering me honestly
The excuse of "just doing out job" is dumb in any context I'm sorry.
Private
Princess of Pop



Aphrodite wrote:
Hmm I get that mods are just doing their job but the rules are dumb af
I have also spoken in finnish in multiple forums without a translations and not once have i gotten a warning
The system just sucks ass and the mods are not being consistent, that's what's bothering me honestly
their job? their job is to detective work a thread related to Hebrew but anything else? nooo...
because why ??

how can they provide inconsistent rules with loopholes
AND not let people express what they think about that when doing an inconsistent job???
there have been SO many threads about the rival site
took them 30 pages to close it and that ONLY when pointed out
any other language thread got locked
we heard about people with a banner not in English (not in Hebrew, anything else) that never got any warning, why?
Account deleted




Time to read up on this topic.
Klavier
Minister of Pop



BunnyButts wrote:
Pls I think the over arching point is the fact that mods are on top of such a nonproblem but are literally absent at bigger problems 
basically
Private
Popstar



the thread was literally named "pt 2", and the first pages were discussion about the closed one. this is what it says in the rules:

"Discussions of closed threads: After a thread is closed, the topic is no longer up for discussion. This includes making other threads trying to continue the conversation or demanding reasons why a thread was closed. If you have a problem regarding the closure, message a moderator for a further discussion."

this could also apply

"Fighting in threads: Heated discussions that become provoking or malicious when dealing with unpopular opinions, political matters, or controversial topics etc. Threads may be closed to prevent fighting from occurring. Due to the fact we are unable to provide examples of every type of fight, it is up to Moderator discretion when dealing with these cases. "

and that's that - if you wanted to change topic you could've made another thread. i get that it's not supposed to be a big deal, but that's the rules?? i don't get what you're trying to insinuate by telling me i'm wrong.
Private
Princess of Pop



BunnyButts wrote:
Pls I think the over arching point is the fact that mods are on top of such a nonproblem but are literally absent at bigger problems 
YEP
and they did rewrite the rules recently but left so many holes and deal with making shit like that happen
why
Aphrodite
World Famous



Alam wrote:
Aphrodite wrote:
Hmm I get that mods are just doing their job but the rules are dumb af
I have also spoken in finnish in multiple forums without a translations and not once have i gotten a warning
The system just sucks ass and the mods are not being consistent, that's what's bothering me honestly
The excuse of "just doing out job" is dumb in any context I'm sorry.
Well they obviously can't do their job properly in this environment nor are they motivated enough to actually take care of stuff
They are just doing their job but the execution is horrible, they don't communicate and they have different ideas of the rules and what's worth giving a warning about and what's not, clearly
Being a mod is not a fun job to have literally anywhere
Hmm
National Star



take away the fighting rule I want to box all vp generations 
Alam
World Famous



brunhilde wrote:
the thread was literally named "pt 2", and the first pages were discussion about the closed one. this is what it says in the rules:

"Discussions of closed threads: After a thread is closed, the topic is no longer up for discussion. This includes making other threads trying to continue the conversation or demanding reasons why a thread was closed. If you have a problem regarding the closure, message a moderator for a further discussion."

this could also apply

"Fighting in threads: Heated discussions that become provoking or malicious when dealing with unpopular opinions, political matters, or controversial topics etc. Threads may be closed to prevent fighting from occurring. Due to the fact we are unable to provide examples of every type of fight, it is up to Moderator discretion when dealing with these cases. "

and that's that - if you wanted to change topic you could've made another thread. i get that it's not supposed to be a big deal, but that's the rules?? i don't get what you're trying to insinuate by telling me i'm wrong.
Bitch where
Klavier
Minister of Pop



hmm wrote:
take away the fighting rule I want to box all vp generations 
but don't u remember? all the pathetic vp users are all bark no bite and they're actually too scared to throw hands ofc
Annie
National Star



when were people fighting tho we were talking about souptons
Private
Princess of Pop



brunhilde wrote:
the thread was literally named "pt 2", and the first pages were discussion about the closed one. this is what it says in the rules:

"Discussions of closed threads: After a thread is closed, the topic is no longer up for discussion. This includes making other threads trying to continue the conversation or demanding reasons why a thread was closed. If you have a problem regarding the closure, message a moderator for a further discussion."

this could also apply

"Fighting in threads: Heated discussions that become provoking or malicious when dealing with unpopular opinions, political matters, or controversial topics etc. Threads may be closed to prevent fighting from occurring. Due to the fact we are unable to provide examples of every type of fight, it is up to Moderator discretion when dealing with these cases. "


and that's that - if you wanted to change topic you could've made another thread. i get that it's not supposed to be a big deal, but that's the rules?? i don't get what you're trying to insinuate by telling me i'm wrong.

there was never a fight there?
how can someone fight about a damn soup topping lmao you sound ridiculous 
also the second thread.. a moderator answering on it like it's totally okay????????????
then another one closing it
like bruh please rules??? rules are out the window when the people that supposed to be enforcing them are not properly
Post comment
Post Comment
To load new posts: activated
First | Previous | Page: | Next | Last